[Pkg-owncloud-maintainers] Would a backport be useful?

[David Prévot]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Jan,

Le 03/06/2013 10:49, Jan Wagner a écrit :
> On Sun Mar 10 23:19:01 UTC 2013, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

>> I will put my cards on the table and say I favour having a good
>> quality package in backports and the chance for ownCloud to be in
>> Jessie.

> is there an estimated timeframe/roadmap for pushing this beast into
> wheezy-backports?

That can’t happen before it hits Jessie, but the last RC issue affecting
ownCloud should vanish with the next upload. That will probably happen
with the next upstream point release (and so, the migration to testing
should happen ten days after that).

> I noticed that the dependencies raised and there is
> a huge amount of packages that needs to get also backported (or maybe
> droping features at build-time).

Actually, there is not much executed at build time, and the ownCloud
version currently in experimental just works as is in Wheezy and even in
Squeeze, so I see little point backporting it for the moment.

Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRzLTWAAoJEAWMHPlE9r0831QIAItoX6Wp9HkmEYn0yfQw0t1P
rqCTupjId0iW+7BmA1OQII9YMYMheQas7Zpaj9ynZVKdYNLgPfy9nu2sqTTDGiaO
yhL8DyLhRhGpvrU+h7gyO9hQoqfC+SgfkP8vXJZ9Y80dKqM2weliR/E/pOxHpEKF
KWDqf4qVyWLxXL9GPxqaxPOZcrEQfqqE+ZUIEMJzT/1+ERep/AUp1MlCIGV8wPag
rbaY+lWqApmLuZbT6tl65DXTasLbxrlxBxtBPIU2ryURHjCEN6/rg978soFaz3Ex
4woUEwwY0IJikCedqIATUYpP0x0c0oylODbL99sDXQDzTPv0tW3aC7AZIPnaVTk=
=NakR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----