<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#2e3436" link="#2a76c6" vlink="#2e3436"><div>Hi Paul,</div><div><br></div><div><span><pre><pre>On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 21:09 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:</pre></pre></span></div><blockquote type="cite"><pre>Hi all,
On 15-02-2019 06:28, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
Hi Paul
<blockquote type="cite">
Hi Alexander
On 14-02-2019 17:41, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
What about these lines from lazarus build log, looks like rebuilt
libqtpas in debomatic has been ignored.
Get:271 <a href="http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian">http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian</a> unstable/main amd64
libqt5pas1 amd64 2.6~beta-5 [496 kB]
Get:272 <a href="http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian">http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian</a> unstable/main amd64
libqt5pas-dev amd64 2.6~beta-5 [142 kB]
</blockquote>
Argg. I missed the upload by Peter in my git archive, so I didn't bump
the correct version. Thanks for catching that. Will retry shortly.
Paul
</blockquote>
Now the problem is that build in debomatic/experimental do not poll
debomatic/unstable archive. IDK is this by design or could be configured.
</blockquote>
I have been able to resolve all the issues and have uploaded lazarus
2.0.0 to experimental.
Are there strong opinions about including this in buster (or not)? If
nobody pushes for it, I think I'll keep it in experimental until after
the release.</pre><pre></pre></blockquote><div>I would like to have this in next stable.</div><div>Is there a particular reason to not have it there?</div><div><div class="-x-evo-signature-wrapper" style="white-space: normal;"><span class="-x-evo-signature" id="1423923852.20958.6@karim"><pre><pre>-- <br></pre>Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
</pre></span></div><div><br></div></div></body></html>