<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#2e3436" link="#2a76c6" vlink="#2e3436"><div><br></div><div><span><pre><pre>Hi Graham,</pre></pre></span></div><div><br></div><div>On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 13:19 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><pre>Hi Abou, Paul
On 2019/05/21 20:57, Paul Gevers wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
On 21-05-2019 17:22, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
BTW: I discovered a quite annoying bug in Lazarus 2.0.0 that is fixed in
2.0.2. I would really push for having 2.0.2 in Buster or at least its
updates. After all this is bug fixes only release. I'll see what I can do.
</blockquote>
You can try to cherry pick the bug fix, but 2.0.2 will not be accepted
in buster if you ask me. We don't do new upstream releases anymore
except if *all* the changes are for important or serious bugs (in the
definition of Debian bugs).
</blockquote>
I think the users of our packages should be our priority.
I support pushing 2.0.2 for Buster. For what it's worth, I've already
sync'd it into Ubuntu and autopkgtests pass there.</pre></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I fully support this especially that we are loosing users who are switching to upstream deb packages due to our long release cycle.</div><div><br></div><div>But it may be very hard to convince the release team of that.</div><div><pre><pre>-- <br></pre>Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir</pre></div></body></html>