<html><head></head><body><div>Hi Peter,</div><div><span><pre><br></pre></span></div><div>On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 14:22 +0100, Peter B wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On 14/04/2025 09:45, Abou Al Montacir wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>I would wait until current version hits testing.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It looks like there is something going wrong with Lazarus RC3.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Can you please check it if you have time when you upload the fixes of <br></div><div>both tickets mentioned above?<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi Abou,<br></div><div><br></div><div>One package fails to build in the lazarus autopkgtest.<br></div><div> packager/registration/fcl_unicodertl.lpk<br></div><div><br></div><div>usr/lib/lazarus/4.0/packager/registration/lazaruspackageintf.pas(29,3)<br></div><div>Fatal: (10022) Can't find unit System.Classes used by LazarusPackageIntf<br></div><div><br></div><div>The failing code is<br></div><div><br></div><div>interface<br></div><div><br></div><div>uses<br></div><div> {$IFDEF FPC_DOTTEDUNITS}<br></div><div> System.Classes;<br></div><div> {$ELSE}<br></div><div> Classes, SysUtils, fgl;<br></div><div> {$ENDIF}<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>There does not seem to be a quick easy fix, neither<br></div><div> Classes;<br></div><div>on its own<br></div><div>or<br></div><div> Classes, SysUtils, fgl;<br></div><div>compile.<br></div><div><br></div><div>This lpk is new in version 4.0, so is clearly a regression.<br></div><div>(It doesn’t not build on Arch either)<br></div></blockquote><div>Maybe we should just undefine FPC_DOTTEDUNITS as FPC version in Debian is too old.</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>{ Maybe we should stick with 3.8 for Trixie?<br></div><div>It seems a solid version, and the toolchain freeze was March 15th.<br></div><div>I guess version 4 could always be backported when finally released? }</div></blockquote><div>I think it would be a pity to not have 4.0 in Trixie.</div><pre style="caret-color: rgb(46, 52, 54); color: rgb(46, 52, 54); font-variant-caps: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4); -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;">-- <br></pre><pre style="caret-color: rgb(46, 52, 54); color: rgb(46, 52, 54); font-variant-caps: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4); -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;">Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir</pre><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote></body></html>