Bug#728613: please support parallel package builds

gregor herrmann gregoa at debian.org
Mon Nov 4 20:03:07 UTC 2013


On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 21:34:22 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:

> > What do others think?
> My guess is that debhelper won't change defaults, even with new 
> compatibility levels, so --parallel will be needed.

My guess re. debhelper is the same.
 
> Are we sure all the builder modules can safely be used in parallel 
> mode?

I'm not sure :)
Probably we'd have to test this if we want it.
 
> If so, I guess it is time to try and employ it.

Hm ... do we know if this is actually helpful? While parallel
building is nice and everything, my pure guess is that it doesn't
help alot, if all, for most of our tiny packages.
(And most of the time is used for chroot setup/teardown, installing
build deps, later lintian, ...)

The time difference should be another test parameter :)


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Spider Murphy Gang: Skandal Im Sperrbezirk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20131104/8ed5c8be/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers mailing list