[From nobody Fri Aug 28 08:20:09 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2026 17:55:48 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.1 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, FOURLA,FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 22; hammy, 150; neutral, 77; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108 Return-path: <ntyni@debian.org> Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:58266) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <ntyni@debian.org>) id 1wyCQ8-00G0tS-2K for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2026 17:55:48 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=xE8lwSOFgLfTD7xPXiNjSLqx7C204eJHWthD11G2yI8=; b=LFO9uUzH+KkF6k4KorYtH2BaPY kzBFOhnDqFxL0yG7hAafzM21sED/9kXEkFtE2At+XqPOjsIyk1qaaADUN5IL7jmDXPpCWjJ850mCl hzSgkfPPzuxylZbsiNMVD0hY3wAP1u6hLQqiufDTTid1sJP81bhlEyjmq9VdoPlvfbM63cw1NuV/C JfvnivnpaBTYrlVljYe+RdtfvP/X1xGm91o3yUo9lvXhtZ+4viC+VG0uzfvHDLPLlYuCpvGdlQb7M mJulIjRWqi9Up6Cv4r7FKqTgc/JUlDD8mwhxwiKEHlwlt9GiDfmPSl7333Piklbxv1reYnZP/kKcs YrqN4FsA==; Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <ntyni@debian.org>) id 1wyCQ6-00D44X-11 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2026 17:55:47 +0000 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 20:55:43 +0300 From: Niko Tyni <ntyni@debian.org> To: submit@bugs.debian.org Subject: libnet-twitter-perl: FTBFS with libnet-oauth-perl 0.33-1: t/10_net-twitter-regression.t fails Message-ID: <aos0Hw6Le4MOX6X3@app-dd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Debian-User: ntyni Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Source: libnet-twitter-perl Version: 4.01043-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid forky This package is failing to build from source in current sid due to a test failure with libnet-oauth-perl_0.33-1. Cannot verify: no acceptable signature method has been stated. Pass allowed_signature_methods => [...] to this message, or set @Net::OAuth::ALLOWED_SIGNATURE_METHODS, naming the method or methods this party expects. Verifying with the method the message itself names would let the sender choose the algorithm, and so the key at t/10_net-twitter-regression.t line 137. # Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen. # Looks like your test exited with 2 just after 36. [...] Test Summary Report ------------------- t/10_net-twitter-regression.t (Wstat: 512 (exited 2) Tests: 36 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 2 Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output t/15_subclass.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 0) TODO passed: 13-16, 18 Files=38, Tests=2946, 21 wallclock secs ( 0.26 usr 0.04 sys + 18.01 cusr 2.36 csys = 20.67 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/38 test programs. 0/2946 subtests failed. This also happens with autopkgtest checks, so it is currently preventing libnet-oauth-perl testing migration. https://ci.debian.net/packages/libn/libnet-twitter-perl/testing/amd64/74535344/ I assume the change in libnet-oauth-perl is intentional and libnet-twitter-perl needs to adapt. Feel free to reassign of course if this is not the case. -- Niko Tyni ntyni@debian.org ]