[From nobody Mon Oct 5 22:17:07 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2026 20:08:03 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-121.3 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 23; hammy, 150; neutral, 132; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--pkgbuilddir, 0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian, 0.000-+--forky, 0.000-+--H*F:U*sanvila Return-path: <sanvila@debian.org> Received: from muffat.debian.org ([2607:f8f0:614:1::1274:33]:35900) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1xDoyh-00F28a-1H for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 20:08:03 +0000 Received: via submission from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA, CN=paradis.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@paradis.debian.org (verified) by muffat.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1xDoyh-004ixH-0u for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 20:08:03 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.paradis; h=Date:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=2Bgze1YU426coBrvSrua/taXl9s1akUNxfJxCBzf2L0=; b=o7+nV2ZMqSiFZKI/3XW8VBX0+o 94UVsulB8+3OhfWc1tvjVFRPaXYSbIBW7mI0OY7sAqpTel26BP+d1/IuxA+KdZ9CuryyHzEUnSj41 Whx/dvnQ+mZGpnlLCHiLf3iI6BxD86/SwD2mE/J6Nz5rjwD0vsc8E5LuwXkfFlgawQfx5Ro7zDiYy P6/59SEZV+Fi6vJQkwDDEA5pDWHfBu1nfLuRkLmOX4mXtiFhKIteHnHF6e1q24HYvJHf2CSsrsu3O UPFFVNeBF4wn1h7HKv88uLg8OOhnNKkv8t8JRzTg5qv3y0OqPMbHucx0o92fAH4CPyUOEFYp0USFw IpFKSjvg==; Received: from sanvila by paradis.debian.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1xDoyh-004HnB-0X for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 20:08:03 +0000 From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: libmixin-extrafields-perl: FTBFS: Can't locate object method "new" via package "Object::HasExtraFieldsRA" at t/refaddr.t line 17. X-Debbugs-Cc: sanvila@debian.org Message-Id: <E1xDoyh-004HnB-0X@paradis.debian.org> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 20:08:03 +0000 Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: src:libmixin-extrafields-perl Version: 0.140003-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs forky sid Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build. Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log is available here: https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202610/ About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS, using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages. If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is fully reproducible. If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and add an affects on src:libmixin-extrafields-perl, so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package. Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [...] # Tried to use 'Object::HasExtraFieldsRA'. # Error: Undefined subroutine &Params::Util::_INSTANCE called at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/blib/lib/Mixin/ExtraFields.pm line 380. # BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/lib/Object/HasExtraFieldsRA.pm line 14. # Compilation failed in require at t/refaddr.t line 14. # BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/refaddr.t line 14. Can't locate object method "new" via package "Object::HasExtraFieldsRA" at t/refaddr.t line 17. # Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 2. t/refaddr.t ............ 1..13 ok 1 - require Mixin::ExtraFields; not ok 2 - use Object::HasExtraFieldsRA; Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) Failed 12/13 subtests Test Summary Report ------------------- t/basic.t (Wstat: 65280 (exited 255) Tests: 2 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2 Non-zero exit status: 255 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 29 tests but ran 2. t/driver-err.t (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 2 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2 Non-zero exit status: 1 t/minidriver.t (Wstat: 65280 (exited 255) Tests: 2 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2 Non-zero exit status: 255 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 16 tests but ran 2. t/refaddr.t (Wstat: 65280 (exited 255) Tests: 2 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2 Non-zero exit status: 255 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 13 tests but ran 2. Files=6, Tests=13, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.02 sys + 0.21 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.29 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 4/6 test programs. 4/13 subtests failed. make[1]: *** [Makefile:866: test_dynamic] Error 255 make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' dh_auto_test: error: make -j2 test TEST_VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess failed with exit status 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ]