<html><head></head><body><div>Hi Tobias,</div><div><br></div><div>On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 13:38 +0100, Tobias Wackenhut wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Hmm, I'm talking about the install section of the README where it says:</div><div><br></div><div>[...]<br></div><div> Install Patches<br></div><div> This is to enable searches for users with a password set.<br></div><div><br></div><div> For RT 5 prior to 5.0.2, apply this:<br></div><div><br></div><div> patch -p1 -d /opt/rt5 < patches/user-admin-callbacks.patch<br></div><div>[patch files for other versions]<br></div><div>[...]</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Ah ha! Right, enough. The good news here is that we have RT 5.0.3 in</div><div>Debian, so the patch isn't required for our RT5 packages. There is a</div><div>patch required for RT4 though, however, we're going to remove RT4</div><div>so it won't be part of the release of Bookworm.</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>If so, I think the changes in the patch files are something that might <br></div><div>be possible to integrate in the core rt4/5 packages as they add pretty <br></div><div>generic callbacks.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I was pondering how to handle it, and yes, applying the patches to our</div><div>released packages would make sense, however, see my comment just</div><div>above. ;)</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>If you would be fine with that, I'd be happy if you could give me the <br></div><div>opportunity try to implement a fix by myself when it is clearer what <br></div><div>would need to be done. I was hoping to make a small PR to practice :) . <br></div><div>So far I've only tried maintaining some packages left behind by a DD in <br></div><div>a private repo after they moved somewhere else and would like to take <br></div><div>small steps towards the Debian project community.<br></div></blockquote><div><span><pre><br></pre><div>That'd be very cool. And we certainly welcome assistance with the RT</div><div>packages!</div><div><br></div><div>You are certainly welcome to submit a MR in Salsa for request-tracker4 - <a href="https://salsa.debian.org/request-tracker-team/request-tracker4">https://salsa.debian.org/request-tracker-team/request-tracker4</a> - </div><div>but I think that might be wasted effort given our desire to remove it</div><div>from Debian.</div><div><br></div><div>If you haven't already, would you like to join the pkg-request-tracker-maintainers</div><div>mailing list? Are you using an RT deployment?</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Andrew</div><pre><br></pre><pre>-- <br></pre><pre>Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand
andrew@etc.gen.nz |
Catalyst Cloud: | This space intentionally left blank
https://catalystcloud.nz |
</pre></span></div></body></html>