[From nobody Tue May 26 11:17:12 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2011 19:38:54 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2008-06-10) on busoni.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 15; hammy, 140; neutral, 48; spammy,
 1. spammytokens:0.941-+--Order hammytokens:0.000-+--H*u:Gnus,
 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:gnu, 0.000-+--H*u:gnu
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00, FOURLA, HAS_PACKAGE,
 PGPSIGNATURE, URIBL_CNKR autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: &lt;ivan@main.uusia.org&gt;
Received: from ip.uusia.org ([62.109.10.102])
 by busoni.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from &lt;ivan@main.uusia.org&gt;) id 1Pu8vm-0007Q8-2B
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:38:54 +0000
Received: from waterlily.ip.uusia.org ([62.109.12.37]
 helo=waterlily.siamics.net)
 by ip.uusia.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from &lt;ivan@main.uusia.org&gt;)
 id 1Pu8u0-0001ty-5K; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:37:04 +0000
Received: from violet.siamics.net ([2002:3e6d:c25::1:1d])
 by waterlily.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from &lt;ivan@main.uusia.org&gt;)
 id 1Pu8tu-0003sQ-0K; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:36:58 +0600
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net)
 by violet.siamics.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
 (envelope-from &lt;ivan@main.uusia.org&gt;)
 id 1Pu8tt-00010g-MU; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:36:57 +0600
From: Ivan Shmakov &lt;ivan@main.uusia.org&gt;
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Ivan Shmakov &lt;oneingray@gmail.com&gt;
Subject: rt-mailgate(1) should support some HTTP authentication 
Reply-To: Ivan Shmakov &lt;oneingray@gmail.com&gt;
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:36:55 +0600
Message-ID: &lt;874o7oc5ns.fsf@violet.siamics.net&gt;
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=&quot;=-=-=&quot;;
 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=&quot;application/pgp-signature&quot;
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: rt3.8-clients
Version: 3.8.8-7
Severity: wishlist

	The current version of rt-mailgate(1) relies on a specific
	=E2=80=9Cbackdoor=E2=80=9D to access the REST interface of RT, like:

    &lt;Location /rt/REST/1.0/NoAuth&gt;
        Order allow,deny
        Allow from ::1 127.0.0.0/8
        Satisfy any
    &lt;/Location&gt;

	However, this configuration is insecure in at least two
	situations:

	=E2=80=A2 the RT installation is on a different host, so that the IP
	  address may be spoofed;

	=E2=80=A2 the host is used for Shell accounts of some less trusted
	  folks.

	OTOH, given that the HTTP basic authentication is only a matter
	of calling the LWP::UserAgent's -&gt;credentials () method (as per
	the documentation [1]), it doesn't seem like a big deal to have
	it supported.

[1] http://search.cpan.org/~gaas/libwww-perl-5.837/lib/LWP/UserAgent.pm

=2D-=20
FSF associate member #7257

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk1r+VcACgkQ+MvqjYjLOAyIEQCg1BRmpC7QfInN/ZjROriXxTKS
QnAAn3bQ+0jlNXhvvt4KOhSUvkb6/SHb
=cWwN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--


]