<html><head></head><body><div dir="auto">Hi Manuel,<br><br>We can work together. :)<br><br>Your change to use packaged dependencies looks like exactly what we need to solve the CI failure. Would you like to merge that on to debian/latest, or would you like me to proceed?<br><br>Thanks for your work,<br>Simon</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">On February 23, 2026 4:07:13 PM CST, Manuel Guerra <ar.manuelguerra@gmail.com> wrote:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="auto">If Simon proceeds with the package update, he can disregard my changes to the debian/upstream branch.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Regards,</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">El lun, 23 de feb. de 2026 17:54, Simon Quigley <<a href="mailto:simon@tsimonq2.net">simon@tsimonq2.net</a>> escribió:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto">Hi Soren, all,<br><br>This sounds good to me. I have 2.6.3 staged in Salsa, please let me know if I should upload that or hold off for now.<br><br>Thanks for looking into this! Let me know if I can help further.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Simon Quigley<br><a href="mailto:tsimonq2@debian.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">tsimonq2@debian.org</a></div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">On February 23, 2026 3:11:27 PM CST, Soren Stoutner <<a href="mailto:soren@debian.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">soren@debian.org</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<pre><div dir="auto">Simon and Manuel,<br><br>I see that you have both been doing work on ruby-commonmarker. The current <br>version in Debian is 0.23.10, which is a legacy branch. The current upstream <br>version is 2.6.3 which involves a lot of breaking changes.<br><br>There are two packages in Debian that depend on ruby-commonmarker: redmine <br>and ruby-jekyll-commonmark.<br><br>The current version of redmine requires commonmarker ~> 2.3.0.<br><br><a href="https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/redmine/-/blob/debian/latest/Gemfile" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/redmine/-/blob/debian/latest/Gemfile</a>?<br>ref_type=heads#L21<br><br>There does not appear to be significant differences between commonmarker 2.3.0 <br>and 2.6.3, so I think we are probably safe to use the latest upstream.<br><br><a href="https://github.com/gjtorikian/commonmarker/releases" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://github.com/gjtorikian/commonmarker/releases</a><br><br>Doing so will break ruby-jekyll-commonmark, which depends on commonmarker -> <br>0.23.4.<br><br><a href="https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll-commonmark/blob/master/jekyll-commonmark.gemspec#L19" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll-commonmark/blob/master/jekyll-commonmark.gemspec#L19</a><br><br>There is an open upstream issue to support commonmarker 2.x, but so far there <br>has been no response.<br><br><a href="https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll-commonmark/issues/61" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll-commonmark/issues/61</a><br><br>ruby-jekyll-commonmark has low popcon installs.<br><br><a href="https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=ruby-jekyll-commonmark" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=ruby-jekyll-commonmark</a><br><br>I try to avoid doing updates that break software. However, in this case, I <br>propose we update ruby-commonmarker to fix redmine and the three transitions <br>it is blocking.<br><br>I have included Daniel, the Uploader of ruby-jekyll-commonmark, to get his <br>feedback.<br><br></div></pre></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></body></html>