[From nobody Sat Jun 20 18:53:05 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2026 09:50:59 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-121.6 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 23; hammy, 150; neutral, 182; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--pkgbuilddir, 0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian, 0.000-+--forky, 0.000-+--H*F:U*sanvila Return-path: <sanvila@debian.org> Received: from muffat.debian.org ([2607:f8f0:614:1::1274:33]:57644) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1wYhUZ-0096wr-14 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 09:50:59 +0000 Received: via submission from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA, CN=paradis.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@paradis.debian.org (verified) by muffat.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1wYhUY-00Gm8D-38 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 09:50:59 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.paradis; h=Date:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=+6MdxGHa9lNa0ID0E7TYDcE2lIU13BxBSspzWxc3jB4=; b=YjqKM3ZAFpw+pxVHINP6vgDJr1 QhdLi16GXMqxECl8Qv/0TcdS/I0+QBvB5UhQZ8aAtrJ9AWvEz9Xmp6CL4Ql4oMi4mTH83psHxKTDj DjlvHUXwJxWFxGDoWHRhUhMvMTexMC/nZ4yP3bZIMgiDSicQfA4RUFnJidJOUIB4jrKTbb3z9OFXt u2mdfy2FnKgWrx7Gh2+pKzOg8cqeMKxwemamAm4L/jc4WZsSX1doI5sqAWr2s7GBK8HrBkdp5tzqV X2RRF4hlHHcryl17mtZxuxf8QhVl6xR2Wpl40aY2EnHsEGOspaWFCa4sF/SLsWOxZV4CP4ZOs30jT oexHPntQ==; Received: from sanvila by paradis.debian.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1wYhUY-00FU6j-15 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 09:50:58 +0000 From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: ruby-bunny: FTBFS: flaky test: Failed examples: rspec ./spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_reject_spec.rb:132 # Bunny::Channel#basic_reject with requeue = default rejects a message X-Debbugs-Cc: sanvila@debian.org Message-Id: <E1wYhUY-00FU6j-15@paradis.debian.org> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 09:50:58 +0000 Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: src:ruby-bunny Version: 3.1.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs forky sid Hello Antonio et al. This failure happens randomly, but I get a failure rate around 38% on machines with 1 CPU and around 66% on machines with 2 CPUs (tried 20 times at least in each case), which is bad enough for a stable release. Follows my standard template for FTBFS bugs: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build. Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log is available here: https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202606/ About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS, using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages. If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is fully reproducible. Caveat: The above should be understood as "where the reported randomness happens". If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and add an affects on src:ruby-bunny, so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package. Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [...] Failures: 1) Bunny::Channel#basic_reject with requeue = default rejects a message Failure/Error: q = ch.queue("bunny.basic.reject.with-requeue-false", exclusive: true) Bunny::ResourceLocked: RESOURCE_LOCKED - cannot obtain exclusive access to locked queue 'bunny.basic.reject.with-requeue-false' in vhost 'bunny_testbed'. It could be originally declared on another connection or the exclusive property value does not match that of the original... # /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-bunny/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/bunny-3.1.0/lib/bunny/channel.rb:2730:in `raise_if_continuation_resulted_in_a_channel_error!' # /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-bunny/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/bunny-3.1.0/lib/bunny/channel.rb:1412:in `queue_declare_without_recording_topology' # /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-bunny/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/bunny-3.1.0/lib/bunny/channel.rb:1368:in `queue_declare' # /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-bunny/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/bunny-3.1.0/lib/bunny/queue.rb:391:in `declare!' # /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-bunny/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/bunny-3.1.0/lib/bunny/queue.rb:90:in `initialize' # /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-bunny/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/bunny-3.1.0/lib/bunny/channel.rb:526:in `new' # /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-bunny/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/bunny-3.1.0/lib/bunny/channel.rb:526:in `queue' # ./spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_reject_spec.rb:134:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>' Finished in 3 minutes 33.1 seconds (files took 0.17811 seconds to load) 489 examples, 1 failure Failed examples: rspec ./spec/higher_level_api/integration/basic_reject_spec.rb:132 # Bunny::Channel#basic_reject with requeue = default rejects a message /usr/bin/ruby3.3 -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/ [too-long-redacted] b --format documentation failed Stopping and halting node bunny@sbuild ... Gracefully halting Erlang VM /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb.rb:52:in `run': /usr/bin/ruby3.3 /usr/bin/gem2deb-test-runner (Gem2Deb::CommandFailed) from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb.rb:64:in `block in run_ruby' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb.rb:87:in `maybe_crossbuild' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb.rb:63:in `run_ruby' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:189:in `run_tests_for_version' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:176:in `block in run_tests' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:175:in `each' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:175:in `run_tests' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:71:in `run_tests' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:57:in `install' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:163:in `install' from /usr/bin/dh_ruby:89:in `<main>' dh_auto_install: error: dh_ruby --install /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/ruby-bunny returned exit code 1 make[1]: *** [debian/rules:12: override_dh_auto_install] Error 25 make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess failed with exit status 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ]