[From nobody Fri Jul 10 15:25:07 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jul 2026 10:40:06 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-121.6 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
 DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,
 SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
 autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 16; hammy, 150; neutral, 136; spammy,
 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian,
 0.000-+--forky, 
 0.000-+--H*F:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--H*rp:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--buildsystem
Return-path: &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;
Received: from mailly.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb:6564:a62:52c3:4b72]:51306)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;) id 1wi8eM-001l6M-2l
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:40:06 +0000
Received: via submission
 from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA,
 CN=paradis.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@paradis.debian.org (verified)
 by mailly.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;) id 1wi8eL-0068Fh-0X
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:40:05 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.paradis;
 h=Date:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=vCag6ckzI+JEZrQ0zie7Y6O/srour0rUwejQXKT110U=; b=VdvqI0jhAyjuK8q4dqMVG9VRiH
 tWBOjwf9nZ2J3xruRWfc+j3S8JUYWFm6wfyig1sOlsTdS/IAlqq/LimUGs1nVfJhKhwt5VfDin6cB
 50uuaAHDgZZj3C/jexEQKzDCBFDWpCxISyQd564urzq61TVHM5r2XQ7w2IMzk9Qi23Vhj0XJBDT3O
 XGVbBl4ZBM2cswk1nbSBaJda45jO8Q8e8z3V4nk3J3/Kx6E7Om9DhQMXlgtC2unX8qCPNTbPxqX9Q
 d8xPIeOLaG3xpFDYjHrsno58fX37MG0qThxn4cdgcClvFTGyNeHJbGvpSnwxkHiq+t8G67umnmDK0
 xNg0CWpg==;
Received: from sanvila by paradis.debian.org with local (Exim 4.96)
 (envelope-from &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;) id 1wi8eK-005OMz-1G
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:40:04 +0000
From: Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;
To: Debian BTS &lt;submit@bugs.debian.org&gt;
Subject: ruby-sasl: FTBFS: undefined method `has_rdoc='
X-Debbugs-Cc: sanvila@debian.org
Message-Id: &lt;E1wi8eK-005OMz-1G@paradis.debian.org&gt;
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:40:04 +0000
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: src:ruby-sasl
Version: 0.0.3.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs forky sid

Dear maintainer:

During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build.

Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most
relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log
is available here:

https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202607/

About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS,
using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages.

If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is
fully reproducible.

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
reassign and add an affects on src:ruby-sasl, so that this is still
visible in the BTS web page for this package.

Thanks.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
 debian/rules clean
dh clean --buildsystem=ruby --with ruby
dh: warning: Implicitly activating single-binary dh addon for backwards compatibility.  In compat 14+,
dh: warning: this fallback will *not* happen automatically via dh_auto_install will instead use a
dh: warning: different default for --destdir unless the single-binary add-on is active,
dh: warning: which can cause the source to produce an empty binary package
dh: warning: 
dh: warning: To keep the existing behaviour (compat 13), please activate the single-binary addon explicitly.
dh: warning: This can be done by adding &quot;dh-sequence-single-binary&quot; to Build-Depends or passing
dh: warning: --with=single-binary to dh.
dh: warning: 
dh: warning: If you have solved this issue differently (e.g., by passing --destdir explicitly to
dh: warning: dh_auto_install or not using dh_auto_install at all) and want to silence this warning
dh: warning: without activating the addon, you can do that by passing --without=single-binary to dh
dh: warning: to explicitly acknowledge the change.
dh: warning: 
dh: warning: Please see the description of the &quot;single-binary&quot; in &quot;man dh&quot; for more details of what
dh: warning: it does and why this is changing from implicit behaviour to explicitly opt-in.
   dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=ruby
	dh_ruby --clean
Invalid gemspec in [ruby-sasl.gemspec.gem2deb]: undefined method `has_rdoc=' for an instance of Gem::Specification
Invalid gemspec in [ruby-sasl.gemspec]: undefined method `has_rdoc=' for an instance of Gem::Specification
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/metadata.rb:135:in `load_gemspec': E: cannot load gemspec ruby-sasl.gemspec (RuntimeError)
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/metadata.rb:37:in `block in initialize'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/metadata.rb:36:in `chdir'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/metadata.rb:36:in `initialize'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/installer.rb:24:in `new'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/installer.rb:24:in `initialize'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:228:in `new'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:228:in `block in installers'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:227:in `map'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:227:in `installers'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:121:in `clean'
	from /usr/bin/dh_ruby:91:in `&lt;main&gt;'
dh_auto_clean: error: dh_ruby --clean returned exit code 1
make: *** [debian/rules:7: clean] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules clean subprocess failed with exit status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
]