[From nobody Sun Aug  2 15:37:08 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2026 22:38:43 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-122.8 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
 DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,
 SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
 autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 15; hammy, 150; neutral, 74; spammy,
 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian, 0.000-+--forky,
 0.000-+--H*F:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--H*rp:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--buildsystem
Return-path: &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;
Received: from mailly.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb:6564:a62:52c3:4b72]:55068)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;) id 1wqILr-006mFd-0B
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2026 22:38:43 +0000
Received: via submission
 from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA,
 CN=paradis.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@paradis.debian.org (verified)
 by mailly.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;) id 1wqILp-00FN97-2V
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2026 22:38:41 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.paradis;
 h=Date:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=su/TAw89lCe16uVifUK9kdKBy9G7kP0EeNkmlJV1s6g=; b=S6hn0vJ8UOz0cnjjNZlLrSu/Ew
 EQ7MsEaF7Ny/san9r/sypBgTTu4+NE1SGZ0ZSU6H1Uu3xRCcGnDewk0sKCGHZfxP8juDI+8sG+/yL
 WhewrFUZUoWj/6lJmTTVLSYA8A6R/i1G2Sa4KysDBsURZ6ZxGp12uWZ0MkSS3GRZRgxQIGpbByQ9D
 XFIBCX/7Ma0r6C0YXKbPju6h/mOnKLr3YeTQdKdTJE0jFqkDTN3FD5aZtAuqejL9FPmIfNBkPUC1s
 FYqYVMR0jv6LS6NXw9p5+PqENvTy01Jk5vyA3DKf6Gs8iYc23awnplG2V4Rcl8yRDmD/j4TVmQJKx
 ec9yBRrg==;
Received: from sanvila by paradis.debian.org with local (Exim 4.96)
 (envelope-from &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;) id 1wqILo-00DZRb-1h
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2026 22:38:40 +0000
From: Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;
To: Debian BTS &lt;submit@bugs.debian.org&gt;
Subject: ruby-nanotest: FTBFS: dh_auto_clean: error: dh_ruby --clean returned
 exit code 1
X-Debbugs-Cc: sanvila@debian.org
Message-Id: &lt;E1wqILo-00DZRb-1h@paradis.debian.org&gt;
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2026 22:38:40 +0000
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: src:ruby-nanotest
Version: 0.9.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs forky sid

Dear maintainer:

During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build.

Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most
relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log
is available here:

https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202608/

About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS,
using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages.

If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is
fully reproducible.

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
reassign and add an affects on src:ruby-nanotest, so that this is still
visible in the BTS web page for this package.

Thanks.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
 debian/rules clean
dh clean --buildsystem=ruby --with ruby
   dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=ruby
	dh_ruby --clean
Invalid gemspec in [nanotest.gemspec.gem2deb]: undefined method `has_rdoc=' for an instance of Gem::Specification
Invalid gemspec in [nanotest.gemspec]: undefined method `has_rdoc=' for an instance of Gem::Specification
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/metadata.rb:135:in `load_gemspec': E: cannot load gemspec nanotest.gemspec (RuntimeError)
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/metadata.rb:37:in `block in initialize'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/metadata.rb:36:in `chdir'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/metadata.rb:36:in `initialize'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/installer.rb:24:in `new'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/installer.rb:24:in `initialize'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:228:in `new'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:228:in `block in installers'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:227:in `map'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:227:in `installers'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/dh_ruby.rb:121:in `clean'
	from /usr/bin/dh_ruby:91:in `&lt;main&gt;'
dh_auto_clean: error: dh_ruby --clean returned exit code 1
make: *** [debian/rules:7: clean] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules clean subprocess failed with exit status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
]