[From nobody Fri Oct 9 16:37:10 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2026 23:00:51 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-121.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 3; hammy, 145; neutral, 42; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian, 0.000-+--forky, 0.000-+--H*F:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--H*rp:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--H*r:sanvila Return-path: <sanvila@debian.org> Received: from muffat.debian.org ([2607:f8f0:614:1::1274:33]:33944) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1xEx6Z-000GJR-2t for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2026 23:00:51 +0000 Received: via submission from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA, CN=paradis.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@paradis.debian.org (verified) by muffat.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1xEx6Z-00052f-0X for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2026 23:00:51 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.paradis; h=Date:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=6x1DZsM6gfatMN6ka6Jx3BHHnxK4m4B/uPRSu7SwYgU=; b=Zzn1j1CoPHE3iQNYow2tWMn0fO 0T5P/4X+ciyfPai81Zdq+qeoV9lbj4iDE7cjGLo4pZZjzh3VUNL0uMNu1a8JrRjaYOBYUoo2fJHyk tvsW1/vscoiabLhiyiHcKdp0irTN5EgGULRcSQlhrCZGb7YK8Ij5S2zj2YtL0/hyTWICXjae0EPv1 17Fou7q1Ly98walrz1NgrEA7nolnZab5lP7ZzsywCBBXp41ZlaykxlLBvn9HHhA/pGfkZyXD6udqs nHwnzJ0cMN849vo2WSJfPb483FY1PtrhE6/k6XIjPCrGPRcRnjmqVW5x6cumk/Lo8HLvLBNxldWad ba2m2oNQ==; Received: from sanvila by paradis.debian.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1xEx6Z-0009iV-0B for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2026 23:00:51 +0000 From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: ruby-typhoeus: FTBFS: Could not find 'redis-client' (= 0.30.1) among 125 total gem(s) X-Debbugs-Cc: sanvila@debian.org Message-Id: <E1xEx6Z-0009iV-0B@paradis.debian.org> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 23:00:51 +0000 Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: src:ruby-typhoeus Version: 1.6.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs forky sid Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build. Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log is available here: https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202610/ About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS, using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages. If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is fully reproducible. If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and add an affects on src:ruby-typhoeus, so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package. Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [...] rspec ./spec/typhoeus/request_spec.rb  Failure/Error: require 'redis'  Gem::MissingSpecError:  Could not find 'redis-client' (= 0.30.1) among 125 total gem(s) [...] ]