[From nobody Fri Oct 16 03:41:09 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2026 10:07:12 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-120.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
 DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,
 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 9; hammy, 150; neutral, 73; spammy, 0.
 spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--pkgbuilddir,
 0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 
 0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian, 0.000-+--forky, 0.000-+--H*F:U*sanvila
Return-path: &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;
Received: from mitropoulos.debian.org
 ([2001:648:2ffc:deb:216:61ff:fe9d:958d]:53654)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;) id 1xHIMi-00AN77-2L
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:07:12 +0000
Received: via submission
 from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA,
 CN=paradis.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@paradis.debian.org (verified)
 by mitropoulos.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;) id 1xHIMh-006OuH-04
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:07:11 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.paradis;
 h=Date:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=Jn9SfnvVaHvKhVKDg5EV18DzJlw8hSc0OgwK9iysvoc=; b=deAx8nZpIr1RrXJ5RkxiBHGxQE
 aueAsAohP/05K3djZu+2YcCcKR+QuuLXNNMsqsyhfZ3MoqbRN1UxAMy2LDZKmYSwkUVEyhQrGoCyQ
 v8s293HVvP8nF0lECKKvhSoX/VHbdOFCvEefiaue3po+881WP4KxEfMsePI8pBsaUnDyRT+377Ipa
 3YG6PNShOEijA8RJQEfZ+1E8pAq0dJiO5x92u9AAOnRJmUMv0ynkTfV4zcqxsupjyVTug5NqQB6Du
 HcuaO/haBggL6j1dKLAdr1CWD3mveMVOrwFFyBk3fjfQzorG10vJ4uPgboo8y3SbQ5Vvzl3b0Vyfe
 d3YzfIww==;
Received: from sanvila by paradis.debian.org with local (Exim 4.96)
 (envelope-from &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;) id 1xHIMf-006IvE-1B
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:07:09 +0000
From: Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;
To: Debian BTS &lt;submit@bugs.debian.org&gt;
Subject: ruby-rspec-profiling: FTBFS: Could not find 'marcel' (~&gt; 1.0) among
 154 total gem(s)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sanvila@debian.org
Message-Id: &lt;E1xHIMf-006IvE-1B@paradis.debian.org&gt;
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:07:09 +0000
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: src:ruby-rspec-profiling
Version: 0.0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs forky sid

Dear maintainer:

During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build.

Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most
relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log
is available here:

https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202610/

About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS,
using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages.

If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is
fully reproducible.

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
reassign and add an affects on src:ruby-rspec-profiling, so that this is still
visible in the BTS web page for this package.

Thanks.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Checking Rubygems dependency resolution on ruby3.3                           │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

RUBYLIB=. GEM_PATH=/&lt;&lt;PKGBUILDDIR&gt;&gt;/debian/ruby-rspec-profiling/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all:/&lt;&lt;PKGBUILDDIR&gt;&gt;/debian/.debhelper/generated/_source/home/.local/share/gem/ruby/3.3.0:/var/lib/gems/3.3.0:/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0:/usr/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby/gems/3.3.0:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/3.3.0:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/rubygems-integration/3.3.0 ruby3.3 -e gem\ \&quot;rspec_profiling\&quot;
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1438:in `block in activate_dependencies': Could not find 'marcel' (~&gt; 1.0) among 154 total gem(s) (Gem::MissingSpecError)
[...]
]