[From nobody Fri Oct 16 03:41:07 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2026 10:07:10 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-121.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 9; hammy, 147; neutral, 42; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian, 0.000-+--forky, 0.000-+--H*F:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--H*rp:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--H*r:sanvila Return-path: <sanvila@debian.org> Received: from mailly.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb:6564:a62:52c3:4b72]:39878) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1xHIMg-00AN6f-07 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:07:10 +0000 Received: via submission from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA, CN=paradis.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@paradis.debian.org (verified) by mailly.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1xHIMe-006TXc-2E for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:07:08 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.paradis; h=Date:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=AYQQsHqfyKh8FXgEEKI1Di6v5M9drP/pxVlo9yHHxiU=; b=RFuHnEohCyDrbtUCI8aDfYIrgz SwOg1E6cpRxxYXmKaAMjfi7Q/UNiD/wy/NCoCLBkdCyab+28sFIk8Rs8dxHlvb1d/gc7HrUBehIjH Zo20tdUZpPVjamUrFind5DAK7FOuhCvqOB82JOhzk0gvE1/DtwYl3fVcS7iOTjGbGptRRktw+McCz mkDO31mxxSNJ3dmLNriBUx16cDEs1F+dTlkwny/TeHBlh4ZYOdP5NuJ0OeBE2D3ULe9r099nud3o7 KZmpA/M/hOUfbBPEJN+Ate0cL7ce446r8OSOGzBUGbEluNOJXgFmjdHed8lLY+Bo0JOwp3eJ8gKR6 YyPkCFEQ==; Received: from sanvila by paradis.debian.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1xHIMd-006Iv5-18 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:07:07 +0000 From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: ruby-factory-bot-rails: FTBFS: Could not find 'marcel' (~> 1.0) among 143 total gem(s) X-Debbugs-Cc: sanvila@debian.org Message-Id: <E1xHIMd-006Iv5-18@paradis.debian.org> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:07:07 +0000 Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: src:ruby-factory-bot-rails Version: 6.5.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs forky sid Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build. Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log is available here: https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202610/ About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS, using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages. If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is fully reproducible. If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and add an affects on src:ruby-factory-bot-rails, so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package. Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [...] rspec ./spec/spec_helper.rb Failure/Error: require "active_storage/engine" Gem::MissingSpecError: Could not find 'marcel' (~> 1.0) among 143 total gem(s) [...] ]