[From nobody Mon Jun  1 23:51:08 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2026 07:56:09 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,
 SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 7; hammy, 118; neutral, 23; spammy, 0.
 spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin, 
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <sramacher@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:59672)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sramacher@debian.org>)
 id 1wNQvQ-00DKTe-3C for submit@bugs.debian.org;
 Thu, 14 May 2026 07:56:09 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:
 Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=OdoLgIwcyBQ7bz9BDN9MfJ16TSKKXfDoHmb936H8I3o=; b=ccwK2yj12rzdHRTzmrPJs+KhiY
 9Lu02dKERVmFsdwh5WjN6u37VJMLwqqNFcvCUAMs09H3do1ClFrM94jSUx3Bafkl7Rz6tqNQxTABD
 +1NyjDwb4jZ533WCAtVUHtR7J/7YOVz0X8y8KNDzeV2/SoD90jRGeVbA3Qoi+KicyP9XU0NIiEhFW
 aLVs9A3yMTbYlERGL4XTbxP3SC5fWjN0fB5K6Urm5h+8WCPqB6XMJwA4l9pX/yCTxPh++dAIj+nCZ
 HT31zM9MrIpNrTBY59PjVeuoEjGay+sb+0BhTSqkFusiLUn7z/7n4tj+zcWS90Z4FmOhfS+5cUVaN
 gaMTa+1w==;
Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sramacher@debian.org>)
 id 1wNQvP-003nBU-0K for submit@bugs.debian.org;
 Thu, 14 May 2026 07:56:07 +0000
Received: by jupiter.ramacher.at (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 5D709100047FE; Thu, 14 May 2026 09:56:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 09:56:05 +0200
From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: rust-openssl: FTBFS: rust-openssl build-depends on missing:
 librust-openssl-sys-0.9+default-dev:amd64 (>= 0.9.114) |
 librust-openssl-sys-0.9+default-dev:amd64 (>= 0.9.114)
Message-ID: <agWAFXkNVFFDyByl@ramacher.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 13.2.0
X-Debian-User: sramacher
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: rust-openssl
Version: 0.10.78-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramacher@debian.org

Dear maintainer,

rust-openssl is BD-Uninstallable on all architectures:

Dependency installability problem for rust-openssl on amd64:

rust-openssl build-depends on missing:
- librust-openssl-sys-0.9+default-dev:amd64 (>= 0.9.114) | librust-openssl-sys-0.9+default-dev:amd64 (>= 0.9.114)


See
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rust-openssl&suite=sid
for details.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
]