[From nobody Fri Jun 12 12:43:04 2026
Received: (at 1137264-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2026 11:41:40 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
 SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 16; hammy, 79; neutral, 17; spammy, 2.
 spammytokens:0.941-+--H*r:bugs.debian.org, 0.852-+--sincerely
 hammytokens:0.000-+--debian, 0.000-+--Debian, 0.000-+--kpcyrd,
 0.000-+--HContent-Language:de-DE, 0.000-+--H*M:4078
Return-path: <kpcyrd@archlinux.org>
Received: from mail.archlinux.org ([2a01:4f9:c010:3052::1]:47624)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <kpcyrd@archlinux.org>)
 id 1wY0GZ-003F8x-36 for 1137264-done@bugs.debian.org;
 Fri, 12 Jun 2026 11:41:40 +0000
Message-ID: <c695f153-2d49-4078-8c34-a82c206b40d5@archlinux.org>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=archlinux.org;
 s=dkim-ed25519; t=1781264492;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=UBUHBqDMRj47M9t2+/xR6HcGJtrnBaEq7apR0vjYSzE=;
 b=PNY/t2LkeowRDQCMrWQWsD4Y0ZAfW/qopsjRlZVHIk49RHKqZuhzctOXLrFdXkY+vbgh57
 utSecPTsPP0Yu9Ag==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=archlinux.org;
 s=dkim-rsa; t=1781264492;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=UBUHBqDMRj47M9t2+/xR6HcGJtrnBaEq7apR0vjYSzE=;
 b=JvVmPnFD8rtl0RSUPbWwjbFLXMfb4V9J3VVeYYRGKUNGKdBetT83DhadM17sqFzurT/ScC
 NlJgQugYcl2lHB241ZLmTQYf24ryM9z4mAQ17TFxGKi1pNKIRtOZgQOlGUAresTyb3QA6q
 3YqvQhbMox5y5+nbikFz/Neb9pQUojl1l1ikJpxNEKch0ew0Ha4Bqh3s8mQcqW5W41MbVf
 w7n6ANVRpw5dbrF/EMKVnSzhVYJ26xzmW5tpakRuR0/9E4iPUv0ZSOVl0p+PkpuUfbfk71
 BXDb1K9fgNb3I8oly1PjrScAum64sxuAHl2R9qcKIJCK/1sOaFpqvhqGWt698pUuPAe7n8
 +4pMCtJMDEcyUVtA7BhouRGJvV+aQ5+ch9dzmPgqyo3Dzao6SYSKLt3o4M+c11LoGlqGj9
 BcLSAcDwOqqaB1VksFoF5B5D/MOktmP2i+YfcRQeRiGPYVpSytT8NMqk44wJN6DpRXnssM
 x4A6EpiO7EL30A3/0I88/HSKk0oWWRCsFpefAkdd4nwst3Q2vMpdwO/UAE/Rus5oiRrcjo
 y1qthVdSQkbnz9Ey/T45sYrDfDhk2OTEJPbXnjQbdRayqF12XvZqcPspWG04kJW+O3TnWr
 cmMtGvwJ0v7TyU1ICJdHDR72rv8+TbOCKec8CVzlv3HdxLjcpVcEw=
Authentication-Results: mail.archlinux.org;
 auth=pass smtp.auth=kpcyrd smtp.mailfrom=kpcyrd@archlinux.org
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 13:41:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: de-DE, en-US
To: 1137264-done@bugs.debian.org
From: kpcyrd <kpcyrd@archlinux.org>
Subject: Re: Should rust-apt-swarm be removed from unstable?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I've applied the user tag, thanks!

The software in question is p2p software, it's usable when running Debian 
unstable on a computer, but including it in a stable release essentially means 
no more changes can be done to the p2p protocol (including it in still the goal 
eventually however).

Sincerely,
kpcyrd]