[From nobody Thu Aug 13 00:07:07 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2026 13:54:35 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-121.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
 DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham
 autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 150; neutral, 59; spammy,
 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian,
 0.000-+--H*Ad:N*Bug, 0.000-+--H*Ad:N*Tracking, 0.000-+--HTo:N*System,
 0.000-+--HTo:N*Bug
Return-path: <anarcat@debian.org>
Received: from marcos.anarc.at ([45.72.186.94]:52556)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <anarcat@debian.org>) id 1wD0hO-008Na4-2V
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:54:35 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=debian.org;
 s=marcos-debian.anarcat.user; t=1776261273;
 bh=50HhCa585HxsoXRZZ14SWwEf0oktXhhjYFfAVkK/y9g=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=Ykl/a8/7qe5ZEWxL8/zIkKrp9ku0dBQbjYSGaz7ZLQ+FdWhvJ8oh1AC2G0RuX0HNo
 xYf4D347wUWjy5u7LUqEMBo67NXVpFxL4TOivTdfKTTyuBCYC+HbmHouBbL975NnGd
 p7aFM9E0OANMVZHCWS+T9XEQj5ldo9Z4n5XX7IK9C7TehhkkCAGOWbqhhgMp2zcSM4
 orw1sVvEZ5+NGKbkTPFhTWjMG6P9UtorfnPJwxo/noo2Du6qPK8xcb3jFYtd1oYGsY
 yPJVu/zA2rdbIg6OTXNZtBeK9M4qgkD0CItEBhalGvQUa1gSDyrgmqJBC0+4Ks56DN
 8F2xiNrKU9Tog==
Received: from angela.anarc.at (unknown [45.72.186.94])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by marcos.anarc.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 579DF10E155;
 Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:54:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by angela.anarc.at (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 47A73EBB9D; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:54:33 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Antoine Beaupre <anarcat@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: should conflict with with time-daemon
Message-ID: <177626127327.2659538.15431340745626948844.reportbug@angela.anarc.at>
X-Mailer: reportbug 13.2.0
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:54:33 -0400
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: ntpd-rs
Version: 1.4.0-6+b3
Severity: normal

Time daemons in Debian typically do this, for example chrony:

Provides: time-daemon
Conflicts: time-daemon
Replaces: time-daemon

ntpsec and systemd-timesyncd do the same. This ensures that, on
installation, other time daemons are correctly removed and only one
time server runs on port 123 and tries to sync the clock!

I think ntpd-rs should do the same.

A.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 13.4
  APT prefers stable-security
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental'), (1, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.12.74+deb13+1-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages ntpd-rs depends on:
ii  adduser    3.152
ii  libc6      2.41-12+deb13u2
ii  libgcc-s1  14.2.0-19

ntpd-rs recommends no packages.

ntpd-rs suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
]