[From nobody Mon Aug 31 03:25:06 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2026 22:07:09 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.2 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,
 FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,
 XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 23; hammy, 132; neutral, 26; spammy,
 0. spammytokens:
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <bunk@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:44990)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with utf8esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <bunk@debian.org>) id 1x0ngD-005D2x-1P
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 22:07:09 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=tujfFqjV/wyH5Hy29mFlCl93RolVw29xM8X+XeVo0fk=; b=muiklElVOz4hqvDwE3wd3RM9EI
 YUoGQZmax8lfWCrECyWF9U9emujNz61pvsFlpyNThbUjXbysZfnKHOsZJx0O/SAJsFDJtU3vaomXg
 ay7rHF6UzBoPMRl6B8SIAB4ziSRP4r3EPNdQitOi2Ojw7KsUfsIJh1MXv94skCOZa6O6feyDh6zWo
 bj/bc/GkQ2udXsc8ZfYNcBIBUsa/lxUihlkU2Xpte74NOpbHpNM2CwldxPABKJeyatwcjzPX6Mnmd
 3qcNLI/ujRQQ3c0sPGJHIRI8R7U/+iT3fH7GgUXlw7a7lXNbuzuY8YXzJz6183AAokOB2azmf3qcY
 pYBqoe6Q==;
Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with utf8esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <bunk@debian.org>) id 1x0ngB-00140Y-1y;
 Sun, 30 Aug 2026 22:07:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: rust-interprocess FTBFS on 32-bit with 64-bit time_t
Message-ID: <178812762716.4142732.3880431623956599312.reportbug@localhost>
X-Mailer: reportbug 13.2.0
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 01:07:07 +0300
X-Debian-User: bunk
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: rust-interprocess
Version: 2.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-interprocess&arch=armhf&ver=2.4.3-1&stamp=1787705916&raw=0

...
error: cannot construct `timespec` with struct literal syntax due to private fields
   --> src/os/unix/c_wrappers.rs:418:8
    |
418 |     Ok(libc::timespec { tv_sec, tv_nsec: d.subsec_nanos() as _ })
    |        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: ...and other private field `__pad` that was not provided
help: consider using the `Default` trait
    |
418 -     Ok(libc::timespec { tv_sec, tv_nsec: d.subsec_nanos() as _ })
418 +     Ok(<libc::timespec as std::default::Default>::default())
    |

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0602`.
warning: `interprocess` (lib) generated 1 warning
error: could not compile `interprocess` (lib) due to 1 previous error; 1 warning emitted
...
]