[From nobody Thu Oct 29 21:01:05 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2026 20:25:02 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.5 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,
 FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 13; hammy, 97; neutral, 25; spammy, 1.
 spammytokens:0.933-+--today
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: &lt;jbicha@debian.org&gt;
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:37170)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;jbicha@debian.org&gt;) id 1xJzLS-00BZJS-23
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 20:25:02 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type
 :To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=SB0fWcHABukP2euVO1MQqMUt63SLU3zt5HT30gVzNOk=; b=LfF7pWktThMdVCMEZR5YGYUL2L
 rZG8s7dkhEicxIvfJFwVTj6WRDZ+hhPZVmKnKzFpaqUoSZ5xYlzoMZlyDLF+U5139BXtGjqR514jB
 kjNFctdAtg1Mxi5pMhr0tNhcGB11St/2iSAALvKChub0Hk8ZEsNOmOxBwmLPTdS/BMe2n93griHUW
 wGs5fXreFCvUt4H8RyzxEI4hqkKOQxE3dy3kkIOd5di956KLGycpxtd80eKn0pwPLy7tyJBvP9xST
 GGvfugCV6f3fA38lmk2vl9gJTH9n9rkIUGcPuef8hI44ichxS0Kp4JGXsgj7elvknTvtoTtR9aDbP
 2e07W0oQ==;
Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;jbicha@debian.org&gt;) id 1xJzLQ-002fFi-1g
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 20:25:00 +0000
Received: by mail-dl1-f54.google.com with SMTP id
 a92af1059eb24-157fe9d771bso215325c88.0
 for &lt;submit@bugs.debian.org&gt;; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 13:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYLYiUT1AdlGY3Oi8SYntKbMrENUhiDVIwPoWm+vmIJpZHqxKkwq
 xYNXFV9wcFqEA8zM+VHXku7afxy4UW4oipWZGPQglHRBuA5h+HEcEU6R54nnNBxw5+qPlicJtu/
 gLP+cs0D3JtbWcONM5epmlLAlVRCYqaVC2FZNYXMXnFyYy029FlM/35plxgYp4MAxoLKQuthZy8
 6FGOGu+htOB4FlTc6wh4UOLA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:7022:2205:b0:16a:8ffd:4977 with SMTP id
 a92af1059eb24-195c6a34c9amr518513c88.17.1792700697975; Thu, 22 Oct 2026
 13:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jeremy_B=C3=ADcha?= &lt;jbicha@debian.org&gt;
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 22:24:20 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: &lt;CAAajCMZYrCjYadWLfG1dQuV1EGubuhFTm0Nu3LSMTZ6sM-F_jQ@mail.gmail.com&gt;
X-Gm-Features: AclHuK9WwoM3FKXph4KLlwnlNWfA-rlibQIvDIEnh_0ITDx0-BT6ITkRGhyAvqM
Message-ID: &lt;CAAajCMZYrCjYadWLfG1dQuV1EGubuhFTm0Nu3LSMTZ6sM-F_jQ@mail.gmail.com&gt;
Subject: rust-twofish: Please update to 0.8
To: submit &lt;submit@bugs.debian.org&gt;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;UTF-8&quot;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Debian-User: jbicha
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: rust-twofish
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: git@rxv.cc

I was working on packaging rust-keepass today. It has switched to
rust-twofish 0.8 which is part of the rust-cipher 0.5 series. Could
rust-twofish be updated to 0.8 and a rust-twofish-0.7 be introduced
for the 2 packages still using it (rust-pgp &amp; rust-sequoia-openpgp)? I
think this would match what was done with many of the other
rust-cipher related crates.

Thank you,
Jeremy B=C3=ADcha
]