[Pkg-samba-maint] RFC: split fhs.patch in two parts

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Christian Perrier (bubulle at debian.org):
> > > This would allow us to discuss the principle of the separation separately
> > > from any of the specific details.
> > 
> > 
> > Here is what I propose, then.
> 
> 
> Any comments before I jump in the pool and propose this upstream?


Julien Cristau already suggested me to jump so I will.

However, we could maybe first discuss the *text* I will send to
upstream before posting to -technical.

We need to describe the patches and why It Is Good for the Samba Team
to change samba to better fit the FHS. Here I somehat suspect some
discussions and potentially some disagreements so we'd better have a
good and clear argumentation. 

Here, I fear not being always as clear as I would like to be which is
why I suggest we first write something together and, yes, this is a
call for Steve..:-)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20070922/33856c70/attachment.pgp