[Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#619132: Bug#619132: samba: Should start after cups

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Steve Langasek (vorlon at debian.org):

> > So, well, after all, I wonder if my fix is really needed.
> 
> Right, I don't think this change should be needed at all.  I guess maybe Sam
> isn't using dependency-based boot?


Yes, I guessed that. For this, I doubt we can really do somethign (or
want to).

About the change I committed, I only have one pro argument: using
"Should-Start" in the package that needs another package to start
before seems more logical to me.

Moreover, the "X-foo" fields in cups seem to indicate that they are
"less official" LSB headers.

It's probably procrastinating but how about keeping my changes and
suggest the CUPS maintainer to drop the "X-foo" LSB headers?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20110322/f73de080/attachment.pgp>