Bug#626048: marked as done (libsdl1.2debian: upstream bug: "SDL_BlitCopyOverlap() assumes memcpy() operates in order")

Tue Jan 10 16:54:18 UTC 2012

Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:52:31 +0000
with message-id <E1Rkew3-0004PO-5q at franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#626048: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.14-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #626048,
regarding libsdl1.2debian: upstream bug: "SDL_BlitCopyOverlap() assumes memcpy() operates in order"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
626048: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626048
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: =?utf-8?q?Nils_Wallm=C3=A9nius?= <nils.wallmenius at gmail.com>
Subject: libsdl1.2debian: upstream bug: "SDL_BlitCopyOverlap() assumes memcpy() operates in order"
Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 11:45:55 +0200
Size: 2683
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sdl-maintainers/attachments/20120110/49e20444/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Felix Geyer <debfx-pkg at fobos.de>
Subject: Bug#626048: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.14-7
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:52:31 +0000
Size: 7655
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sdl-maintainers/attachments/20120110/49e20444/attachment-0001.mht>