From Debian libSDL maintainers, any plans for bugfix release?

Ryan C. Gordon icculus at icculus.org
Fri Jan 15 00:27:10 UTC 2016


> One concern that we/I have with the growth of structs is that for
> example if an existing program created an array of SDL_MouseWheelEvent
> (or uses "sizeof" for any other reason), and increments a pointer to
> access the different elements of the array, can be problematic.

True, but that struct is part of a union with padding to deal with this situation. Keeping just an SDL_MouseWheelEvent around would be weird (apps keep the wrapping SDL_Event union instead).

> No crashes yet, because we didn't uploaded the packages yet.
> 
> (Note what I said above of 2.0.2 vs 2.0.3, if it's relevant).

Yeah, 2.0.3 is a brown-paper-bag release for a build error in 2.0.2, while 2.0.4 is like 1,300 fixes over 1.5 years. :)

We have been very strict about binary compatibility, and what we call 2.0.4 was field-tested by millions of Steam users over the last six months, so you are probably safe to update the packages without rebuilding everything. But if there's a specific regression, we are happy to ship a 2.0.5 to address it right away.

--ryan.




More information about the Pkg-sdl-maintainers mailing list