<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">
On 07/02/2014 06:32 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">> Am 02.07.2014 17:23, schrieb
VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS:<br>
>> On 07/02/2014 05:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Never saw a warning and never failed to install anything!
I checked the<br>
>> test is there in 208 too and it is.<br>
>> I even did extract the code and tested it:<br>
>><br>
>> needed_symbols='inotify_init signalfd accept4
open_by_handle_at<br>
>> timerfd_create epoll_create'<br>
>> for symbol in $needed_symbols; do if ! egrep
"^[a-fA-F0-9]+ T<br>
>> \.?sys_${symbol}$" /proc/kallsyms; then missing_symbol=1;<br>
>> abort_install=1; break; fi; done<br>
>> ffffffff810e875f T sys_inotify_init<br>
>> ffffffff810ebb16 T sys_signalfd<br>
>> ffffffff81488a25 T sys_accept4<br>
>> ffffffff810f7391 T sys_open_by_handle_at<br>
><br>
> Hm, so CONFIG_FHANDLE is not set by your locally built
kernel, yet you<br>
> have the sys_open_by_handle_at symbol?<br>
><br>
> You mentioned that you installed the standard Debian kernel
in between.<br>
> I assume you didn't run this test on that kernel but your
locally built one?<br>
><br>
> If the sys_open_by_handle_at really exist if CONFIG_FHANDLE
is disabled,<br>
> we need to investigate this further and how to reliably
detect that feature.<br>
><br>
> Michael<br>
><br>
></span><br>
Sorry this was not clear, I have just checked the scripts works and
I did on kernel that had the CONFIG_FHANDLE already. So I do not
understand why I never saw a warning.<br>
<br>
-- eric<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>