vdr-plugin-softdevice now in SVN repository

[Nicolas Huillard]

Tobias Grimm a =E9crit :
> Nicolas Huillard wrote:
>=20
>>Nota : there is a possibility to compile softdevice output methods in
>>stand-alone .so, that I disabled, because they get installed in the
>>plugin directory, and runvdr tries to run them as plugin (which they
>>are not). Maybe there is a better way to do that than disabling .so
>=20
> It wouldn't be too hard to install these sub-libs in another directory.
> As far as I saw, the plugin has an option to specify the sub-lib
> directory. But I'm note sure, this will make a big difference. As ffmpe=
g
> is linked statically, the plugin itself is pretty big anyway - with or
> without the sub-libs. Do you see any advantage in separating the output
> libs?

I don't.
I think Martin developed this feature. I don't know the exact reason.
I wouldn't qualify this binary as "big" (167Kb, vs 217kb for vdr-xine,=20
325kb for vdr-mp3) :

-rw-r--r--  1 root root 100960 Apr 28 17:21 libvdr-dvd.so.1.3.23
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 140512 Apr 28 17:10 libvdr-femon.so.1.3.23
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 325856 Apr 28 16:56 libvdr-mp3.so.1.3.23
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 189536 Apr 28 17:01 libvdr-sc.so.1.3.23
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 167552 Apr 28 17:09 libvdr-softdevice.so.1.3.23
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 217088 Apr 18 00:19 libvdr-xine.so.1.3.23

Maybe we do not have the exact same linking (Marillat vs. Debian) ?

--=20
NH