<html><head></head><body><div>Hi Jonas,</div><div><br></div><div>Am Donnerstag, dem 07.01.2021 um 14:14 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><pre>Hi again, Bruno,</pre><pre><br></pre><pre>Quoting Bruno Kleinert (2021-01-07 13:32:34)</pre><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><pre>Am Donnerstag, dem 07.01.2021 um 12:34 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:</pre><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><pre>Quoting Bruno Kleinert (2021-01-07 11:46:08)</pre><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><pre>the package description is too "shy" and should include buzzwords </pre><pre>and search terms.</pre><pre><br></pre><pre>Since other video conference tools like BigBlueButton and Jitsi </pre><pre>Meet are not included in Debian, Jami can partly substitute those. </pre><pre>An improved description can help users to find Jami as a solution </pre><pre>for their needs in the package archive.</pre></blockquote><pre><br></pre><pre>No, goal of package description is not to sell but to inform: Avoid </pre><pre>buzzwords but include actual facts.</pre></blockquote><pre><br></pre><pre>Maybe the paragraph "To some degree Jami provides similar […]" is too </pre><pre>much.</pre></blockquote><pre><br></pre><pre>From where are you quoting the above?</pre><pre><br></pre><pre>It would probably help if you propose a concrete text to replace or be </pre><pre>appended to existing package description. My apologies if that is </pre><pre>exactly what you did already and I simply missed it somehow.</pre><pre><br></pre><pre>[ after re-reading original post, and then again a third time...]</pre><pre><br></pre><pre>OOOOHHH, now I see your patch. I am very sorry, I totally missed that </pre><pre>in my first reply.</pre></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Aaaaah, that explains your first reply! :) When I read it I was wondering "Phhh, did he even just ignore the patch?!" :D</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><pre><br></pre><pre>Your proposed patch looks fine to me. Only part I dislike is the </pre><pre>paragraph linking to upstream and enumerating other platforms: Package </pre><pre>has a Homepage field to reference upstream, and I find it better to </pre><pre>mention more broadly that "Jami is available on non-Linux paltforms as </pre><pre>well."</pre><pre><br></pre><pre>Also, concretely, the paragraph "To some degree..." looks fine to me.</pre><pre><br></pre><pre><br></pre><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><pre>However, everything else is facts. My use of the word buzzwords was </pre><pre>probably wrong, I meant search terms that users likely apt search for </pre><pre>to find a substitution of a proprietary (Skype, WhatsApp, …) program </pre><pre>or something that is not yet available in Debian (BBB, Jitsi Meet).</pre></blockquote><pre><br></pre><pre>It was the word buzzwords that made me react strongly - I do agree with </pre><pre>you that current package description is vague. Sorry that I did not </pre><pre>make that clear.</pre><pre><br></pre><pre><br></pre><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><pre>Please reconsider your decision, the patch is intended to support our </pre><pre>users.</pre></blockquote><pre><br></pre><pre>To clarify, I am providing input on this bugreport but not "deciding". </pre><pre>Sorry if my opinions come across as definitive.</pre><pre><br></pre><pre><br></pre><pre> - Jonas</pre><pre><br></pre></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Never mind, I'm glad we sorted out the misunderstanding early before any pillow fight started :) From the Uploaders field I assume Alexandre may be the one who decides how to proceed.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Bruno</div><div><span></span></div></body></html>