[From nobody Thu Oct  8 03:17:06 2026
Received: (at 1150287-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2026 02:15:36 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,
 FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 17; hammy, 85; neutral, 25; spammy, 0.
 spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin, 
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <sjr@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:34560)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sjr@debian.org>) id 1xEdfU-005s5Y-2O
 for 1150287-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2026 02:15:36 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type
 :In-Reply-To:References:To:From:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To
 :Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=qe/FQLKa+M+vPFO9C1/Umf3RD42QRs58vzrNbgq9cQA=; b=JPzO6RUMP+TFHEJ2s6eJGZld39
 jl/aA45VSB0YUZ2ugDn8X4LboNTsYFhJb9FWuk+0WUtoP0y0e/Ad5wXrIKMJ28WjmtLgEPLWCRyt9
 rcyomR45eH5nAbvo2vNS28cKwVnmvMR3yH10w51JrlY2k05hg26GZSDITBYYIFCWyVZPEbW91S912
 Nxx1kjYnwufNbWMILmPHSJLtXsUtj+RMSTiEj0hX+8a2YSnH3iurfKCtzpS0Qr9Q9qc7QvTOA1irR
 Ex6Jy5zHK582Fi7231xORfgOgwaxg7uokrHUMaXUBr0mkIl+Hh+qp+BZGjd9avmIrhyDnCwJfXTsv
 o0/agqCQ==;
Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sjr@debian.org>) id 1xEdfS-005C5Y-2w
 for 1150287-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2026 02:15:35 +0000
Message-ID: <393c2d77-aa01-4d59-bc2f-bccbd31b7529@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 11:15:29 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Bug#1150287: [bookworm] no Priority
From: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
To: 1150287-done@bugs.debian.org
References: <179142527296.2355657.8293863449964738905.reportbug@malatang>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <179142527296.2355657.8293863449964738905.reportbug@malatang>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Debian-User: sjr

Hi,

On 10/8/26 11:07 AM, Simon Richter wrote:

> the packages in bookworm don't have a Priority field, but this is still
> required for bookworm and only optional (heh) for trixie and above.

Nevermind, it's only the package in bookworm-security, the one in 
bookworm itself is fine, and I suspect that any future security updates 
will be based on that.

    Simon]