<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2712.300" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=130354110-10012002>I don't know if this
is the right place to ask.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=130354110-10012002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=130354110-10012002>But here goes
</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=130354110-10012002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=130354110-10012002>I notice that
SaneTwain is mentioned in 'related products' on the web site but the twain
bridge is mentioned in frontends,It would seem more logical to me for SaneTwain
to be in the Frontends especially as this program actually works and is up to
date as against the winsane packages which are hopelessly out of date and don't
work anyway.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=130354110-10012002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=130354110-10012002>Maybe removing the
references to both Winsanes would be a good idea as I yet to find anyone who has
got them to work but know lots of people who have wasted hours
trying.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=130354110-10012002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=130354110-10012002>But things are
looking up windows now has the excellent Xsane as a standalone scanning
solution and sanetwain as a twain interface for embedded
scanning.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=130354110-10012002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>