<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>
<div>Hello, Alexander Pevzner.</div>
<div>I have sane-airscan version (0.99.9+67.1 amd64) currently installed.<br/>
Now I am seeing on https://github.com/alexpevzner/sane-airscan that version<br/>
https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/pzz/xUbuntu_20.04/amd64/sane-airscan_0.99.15+74.1_amd64.deb<br/>
Is available for Mint 20.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>1. I am seeing in my prior post I wrote (Whereis prior sane-airscan did not scan correctly with the MFC-J485DW). It was obviously a different package affecting the scan output then sane-airscan package. I recall that I could scan using sane-airscan but output was all grey or something completely NON legible.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>1. I suppose I should probably update the installed version of sane-airscan to (0.99.15+74.1_amd64.deb) correct?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>2. With sane-airscan version (0.99.9+67.1 amd64) currently installed. The brother MFC-J485DW works with xsane 0.999 to scan using sane-airscan eSCL option. I think it can be added to the compatible list maybe.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>3. I notice with sane-airscan version (0.99.9+67.1 amd64) that 600 dpi is maximum. When I use the Brother device driver I can select 1200 dpi.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thankyou</div>
<div>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</div>
<div>Hi Paul,</div>
<div>On 8/25/20 10:23 PM, pj.world@gmx.com wrote:<br/>
> Which option is prefered it seems now with updates applied today through<br/>
> the PPA all are functional. Whereis prior sane-airscan did not scan<br/>
> correctly with the MFC-J485DW. sane-airscan worked fine on my<br/>
> HP-Officejet 4630 though.</div>
<div>Regarding sane-airscan, what version do you use?</div>
<div>--</div>
<div> Wishes, Alexander Pevzner (pzz@apevzner.com)</div>
<div> </div>
</div></div></body></html>