<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi,</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I found on the supported devices list the Canon GX7000 USB
scanner</p>
<p><i>PIXMA GX7000 USB 0x04a9/0x18a8 Untested
Testers needed! pixma (0.28.6) sane-pixma</i><br>
<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I am pleased to announce you I have this printer.<br>
<br>
When I execute the sane-find-scanner, I see these informations
=><br>
</p>
<p><i>found possible USB scanner (vendor=<b>0x04a9</b> [Canon],
product=<b>0x18a8</b> [GX7000 series]) at libusb:001:003</i></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Vendor and product ids are correct.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I also be able to find scanner with scanimage -L =></p>
<p><i>device `pixma:04A918A8_03359A' is a CANON Canon PIXMA GX7000
Series multi-function peripheral<br>
device `airscan:e0:Canon GX7000 series (USB)' is a eSCL Canon
GX7000 series (USB) ip=127.0.0.1, ::1<br>
</i></p>
<p>The question is what kind of test should I perform. Is there a
process describe somewhere?</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I already found an issue. With xsane, the ADF is not correct with
the pixma driver device (the AD Fis not duplex). But it is
correctly defined with airscan device driver.</p>
<p>I've not tested bjnp and mfnp protocol, But I think it will not
work, because the port scanning on the scanner IP does not include
8610, nor 8612.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Let me know what additional tests shall I perform.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>If you have any idea to correct the ADF type with pixma driver, I
will test it.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Regards.</p>
<p>Tom<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>