[Amavisd-new-debian-devel] transition from amavisd-new-milter to amavisd-milter

[Alexander Wirt]

Harald Jenny schrieb am Thursday, den 26. August 2010:

> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:36:53PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Harald Jenny schrieb am Thursday, den 26. August 2010:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 07:03:55PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, Harald Jenny wrote:
> > > > > does nobody have an opinion on this?
> > > > 
> > > > I don't have anything against it, but I also have no idea whatsoever whether
> > > > it will work well, due to configuration issues. 
> > > 
> > > It for sure won't work OOTB :-)...
> > > 
> > > > Still, it is a lot better
> > > > than leaving a broken package that doesn't exist anymore behind, so I'd say
> > > > go for it.
> > > 
> > > Well I would have said the same.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > If there are configuration issues, a NEWS.Debian entry should be able to
> > > > take care of it (plus a bug on the release notes, so that it is mentioned
> > > > there as an one-liner).
> > > 
> > > You mean in amavisd-new-milter or in amavisd-milter? amavisd-milter currently
> > > has no NEWS as it's already new ;-).
> > > 
> > > Alexander, what's your opinion on this question? I guess you don't have time so
> > > I would build the transitional package but you would have to upload it and get
> > > it in testing...
> > I currently don't have time to manage any testing transitions except of my
> > own. 
> 
> Anybody else? One hint please: Should the transitional package be part of
> amavisd-new or amavisd-milter?
Since amavisd-milter was never part of the dependency chain of amavisd-new
its part of amavisd-milter. 

Alex