[Amavisd-new-debian-devel] the debian l10n template feature
Alexander Wirt
formorer at formorer.de
Fri Sep 9 08:32:20 UTC 2011
Harald Jenny schrieb am Donnerstag, den 08. September 2011:
> Hi Alex
>
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:06:51PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Harald Jenny schrieb am Tuesday, den 09. August 2011:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:46:57PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh schrieb am Tuesday, den 09. August 2011:
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > > > > during the work on 2.7.0 I again stumbled about the feature of
> > > > > > /etc/amavis/<lang>/. I would have to provide a patch for 2.7.0 for getting
> > > > > > the feature working again, as there are several new templates in the code.
> > > > > > Additionally I have to say that I dislike that diverging from upstream thingy
> > > > > > as it is error proven.
> > > > >
> > > > > We implemented it before upstream did, I think. That caused the divergence.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am not sure if somebody is really using that "feature", so I would opt in
> > > > > > removing it. Any oppinions here?
> > > > >
> > > > > I used to ship pt_BR translations in the package, and our l10n team could
> > > > > translate the templates if we asked them to and made them aware of the
> > > > > templates (since they're not gettext/autopoint stuff). The lang/ way of
> > > > > doing things used to make it MUCH easier to handle l10n updates.
> > > > >
> > > > > But I certainly don't object to switching to whatever upstream does in
> > > > > 2.7.0, as long as it doesn't make it impossible to deal with when you
> > > > > actually use it or distribute l10n files.
> > > > >
> > > > > l10n'd notifications are a killer feture.
> > > > unfortunatly there is no real solution inside amavisd. Just the l10n snippet
> > > > from debian. Marc added several templates over the last years but he didn't
> > > > updated that l10n snippet so not every of the template can be accessed via
> > > > the l10n version.
> > > >
> > > > So it seems I have to deal with that patch, update it and give marc a patch.
> > >
> > > As our company also uses the l10 feature I would be more that willing to help
> > > you with this work - how can I help you?
> > Get extract-upstream-en_US-templates.pl (should be done) in sync with the
> > template in __DATA__
>
> Done - capitalization of spam changed, pushed the change to master repository.
>
> > and sub read_l10n_templates($;$) from amavisd.
>
> You mean adding the new template files to read_l10n_templates or what exactly?
>
> > All
> > templates should get extracted with useful names
>
> They seem not too bad:
> template-auto-response.txt
> template-dsn.txt
> template-problem-feedback.txt
> template-release-quarantine.txt
> template-spam-admin.txt
> template-spam-sender.txt
> template-virus-admin.txt
> template-virus-recipient.txt
> template-virus-sender.txt
>
> > and amavisd should catch
> > them up in read_l10n_templates.
>
> Attached a patch proposal, is this sufficiant?
>
> > If this is done create a patch a forward it
> > to the amavis mailinglist.
>
> Can you confirm that what I've done is correct and complete?
Narf. I haven't reviewed this yet. But please don't commit into master if is
not your package and you want a review.
Alex
--
Alexander Wirt, formorer at formorer.de
CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A
More information about the Amavisd-new-debian-devel
mailing list