[Android-tools-devel] would bionic be packaged ?

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

Exactly.  Bionic is only for the Android OS, not for the SDK or tools.
We're not packaging the OS, we're packaging the SDK and tools.

.hc

殷啟聰:
> Hi Agarwal,
> 
> Bionic is highly optimized for battery saving on mobile device and is
> mainly used in Android itself, but the SDK is running on a ordinary
> machine, which mean Bionic is unnecessary for the SDK. This is the
> same as we use OpenJDK instead of Apache Harmony to build and run SDK
> tools written in Java.
> 
> Hence, there's currently no plan of packaging Bionic.
> 
> Regards,
> Kai-Chung Yan
> 
> 
> 2016-03-22 23:33 GMT+08:00 shirish शिरीष <shirishag75 at gmail.com>:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Forgive me if I'm wrong. As per my understanding, Google created
>> Bionic as Glibc was thought to be big and unwieldy. It is also one of
>> the reasons why even ulibc was created. If we are going to be true to
>> android, would we also be having bionic or ulibc sometime soon and if
>> yes, would those packages be in conflict with the glibc library or how
>> is that going to work ?
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bionic_%28software%29
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UClibc
>>
>> I did searches using $aptitude search $PACKAGENAME and more often than
>> not, it does give some answers even if the naming is a little
>> different, but this time both are blank.
>>
>> Look forward to know.
>>
>> --
>>           Regards,
>>           Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
>>   My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
>> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
>> http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
>> EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Android-tools-devel mailing list
>> Android-tools-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/android-tools-devel
> 
> 
>