[Android-tools-devel] Bug#935308: messed up regex

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 22:45 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 23:20 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > Ok, this is embarrasing: after discussing that Debian version regex
> > and
> > the version scheme for proposed-updates, I failed to see that the
> > regex
> > was wrong (see https://bugs.debian.org/935938).  Its fixed now in
> > 25.0.0+11+deb10u1.  And hopefully I got the version right.
> 
> No, that version is higher than unstable.
> 
> I'm a little confused by what you've uploaded now:
> 
> android-sdk-meta | 25.0.0+10         | stable           | source
> android-sdk-meta | 25.0.0+11~deb10u1 | proposed-updates | source
> android-sdk-meta | 25.0.0+11~deb10u2 | stable-new       | source
> android-sdk-meta | 25.0.0+11         | testing          | source
> android-sdk-meta | 25.0.0+11         | unstable         | source
> android-sdk-meta | 25.0.0+11+deb10u1 | stable-new       | source
> 
> ~deb10u1 is the source I originally accepted, which generated the
> duplicate binary package versions. What's ~deb10u2?

OK, I've now seen the diffs, and the -12 upload to unstable. That
answers some of my questions, but...

+android-sdk-meta (25.0.0+11+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
+
+  * fix version: this adds on top of package from sid
+
+ -- Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at eds.org>  Thu, 29 Aug 2019 23:05:54
+0200
+
+android-sdk-meta (25.0.0+11~deb10u2) buster; urgency=medium

That version would be correct iff the remainder of the changelog was
from sid.

Will 25.0.0+11~deb10u2 build correctly-versioned binary packages if I
accept that one?

I noticed that +12 that just hit sid has

   * Revert "remove broken screenshot2 symlink (Closes: #924175)

although I can't see why from looking at the bug report. That change
was also included in the p-u uploads - should it be reverted there?

Regards,

Adam