[Aptitude-devel] Trying to install apt version 0.8.16~exp13 as it solved one of my issues .
shirishag75 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 9 08:44:36 UTC 2012
2012/3/9 Daniel Hartwig <mandyke at gmail.com>:
> 2012/3/9 shirish शिरीष <shirishag75 at gmail.com>:
>> Hi all,
>> I was trying to install apt 0.8.16~exp13 as it has solved one of the
>> issues that had been plaguing me and that is the translations take
>> quite a bit of bandwidth. See the bug about pdiffs and translations
>> that was fixed in the most recent upload (which became apt
>> 0.8.16~exp13). While trying to update it to the apt 0.8.16~exp13 it
>> seems there are lot of tools which are holding it back.
> Hi Shirish
> IIRC you had this same problem in February :-)
> Please do not install experimental APT on your *desktop* system. Thanks.
> As mentioned in the replies to your earlier email , this version of
> APT is being kept in experimental while the state of multi-arch settles
Oops and sorry for the noise. I guess just my immaturity or/and
impatience showing here. Guess will have to wait when dpkg and
multiarch stuff are finalized. Thank you though for taking time to
> In the meantime, I would not expect the smaller utilities (apt-file,
> apt-listbugs, etc.) to be updated in experimental. These programs are
> only of use in a complete system.
>  http://lists.debian.org/deity/2012/02/msg00051.html
> By looking at #639290 (which you mentioned last time as motivation for
> this) I can see some users have hinted at a work around:
>  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639290#224
>  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639290#229
> I suggest to try that if you have not already.
Thank you, have done but also good to have it in record.
>> Another thing that I was kinda shocked to find is that most apt-utils
>> don't seem to have a webpage/homepage associated with them. I filed
>> one for apt-file Bug #663139 and at least would do so for couple of
>> the apt tools I like but does not seem to be an easy way to to get the
>> new apt.
> Do not be shocked :-) These are small utilities which have very
> specific functions tied to the APT system. Most of them already
> perform their function well. "Roadmaps" are not particularily useful
> for tools such as these.
Guess but having a webpage or wiki page so people have some info. on
it won't hurt. I have filed the relevant wishlist bugs for some of the
apt-tools. I could start wiki pages for each of the tools I find
interesting with the Long description and TODO listed in
/usr/share/doc/$packagename (obviously some apt-tool) but as have no
further info. such as the scm address or/and what the maintainer's
goals are, would be nice if such pages exist (and maintained). Please
lemme know what do people think. If that is a go then could at least
have some crude pages for now (basically copy-pasting stuff).
> From your bug report it looks like you are interested in knowing when
> apt-file, etc. will be updated to support apt 0.8.16. This is most
> likely to happen when 0.8.16 is release to unstable. There is no
> projected date for that as yet.
Actually the motivation now has changed for apt has changed ;-)
Please see # bug 657902 which has been closed by the new apt version.
The only thing I could not understand from Joerg's Jasper's statement
 was this :-
alternatively this will just break our archive, lets see in next 'dinstall...'
the quotes around dinstall are for emphasis, what does dinstall mean, anyone ?
Thank you again.
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17
More information about the Aptitude-devel