[Aptitude-devel] About status of aptitude-gtk -- split off into separate source package? (GSoC project?)
abe at debian.org
Tue Mar 20 12:54:00 UTC 2012
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> > Aptitude-curses has a unique place in this environment. However, it
> > has proven difficult to translate this to Qt and GTK+ interfaces and
> > keep everything in sync between them. It might be time to simply
> > delegate the -qt and -gtk interfaces to the archives.
> After thinking a bit more about this, I would prefer just to ship -gtk
> (not sure if -qt is in even more "basic" state) until freeze,
I'd disable building the package (and only that) now without removing
any code. I suspect that this will get some more attention than just a
NEWS entry (which should be done anyway).
> adding a piece of NEWS about the future removal,
You mean writing the NEWS entry "now", before removal time, I guess.
IMHO the NEWS entry in the package should correspond to things changed
in the given version, so I'm not sure if that's the ideal way. I think
it's doable, though.
I'd also make a blog posting on Planet Debian (can do that) and a
maybe also a mailing list posting debian-devel at l.d.o at that point
(can do that, too).
> then remove it if nothing happens
Do you think of removing the code or just of no more building the
> so it doesn't enter the next stable relase.
Hmmm, I'm slightly undecided what would be better: Shortly before the
freeze or as much before the freeze as possible (i.e. now).
Since just disabling building the package is easily revertable (just
has to go through NEW once), I think the earlier removal is the better
way, as we then have more time to re-add it. (Despite I'm not very
convinced that this will happen soon.)
The opinion on #debian-release on IRC also seems to be to no more
build it rather now than later.
> This way it would give an opportunity for a few more months for people
> to step up without requiring more effort, and if not picked up by
> somebody, just "move it to archives".
> So basically, I don't think that we need to spend more time/effort
> with this,
> splitting in different source packages and so on.
... only if someone wants to maintain it, yes.
> We can give it a last chance, but if it's going to survive, somebody
> will have to step up to do the major up-lifting.
> In that case, the source-split is not very significant amount of
> work compared to the rest.
I fear so, yes.
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe at debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
More information about the Aptitude-devel