[Aptitude-devel] Bug#667793: Bug#667793: b-d not tight enough? (was: Re: ... add patch)
Axel Beckert
abe at debian.org
Wed May 30 05:03:03 UTC 2012
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> retitle 667793 aptitude: FTBFS when trying to backport to squeeze
[...]
> > Indeed, but the submitter appears to be trying to build 0.6.6 in
> > squeeze anyway.
[...]
> > > The build-depends state libsigc++-2.0-dev but version 2.2.4.2-1
> > > from squeeze does not suffice, version 2.2.10-0.1 works.
[...]
> | Debian Release: wheezy/sid
> | APT prefers stable
> | APT policy: (900, 'stable'), (500, 'testing'), (410, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental'), (111, 'oldstable')
[...]
> > Which is not something I have yet investigated. In theory, provided
> > the more recent apt libraries are used (and these build-depends
> > corrected) a backport to squeeze should be fine.
>
> But then again, this would be an issue of an actual backport (if
> anyone wants to do that) and that's not really supported the BTS (yet).
>
> So I'd even downgrade it to wishlist.
Have to correct myself: Severity should be at least minor as this
implies that our build-dependencies are not tight enough.
Deducing from the bug report we may need to add some ">= 2.2.10-0.1"
or similar to the libsigc++-2.0-dev build-dependency.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe at debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
More information about the Aptitude-devel
mailing list