[Aptitude-devel] Bug#137771: #137771: aptitude's vs dpkg's hold state (was: Processed: more bts etc.)
mandyke at gmail.com
Fri Oct 5 02:56:22 UTC 2012
On 5 October 2012 10:44, Daniel Hartwig <mandyke at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I browsed through the merged bugs, but the only hint I found so far
>> about the issue described in http://bugs.debian.org/137771 is in
>> "the databases do not contain exactly equivalent information, and
>> there is no one-to-one translation between them" (But it's not
>> mentioned what the differences actually are.)
> I have seen this comment (quite old) but not investigated its claim
> yet. I *suspect* that it no longer applies and was originally to do
> with MarkInstall, etc. not respecting dselect holds, or something
> Burrows submitted functionality to APT  to support this which has
> been applied for some time and now APT does now respect the dselect
> holds. This cleaned up a lot of the issues users were expecting, but
> the greater problem of aptitude holds not being respected by other
> tools remains.
>  http://bugs.debian.org/470035
Something that anyone could do is to investigate this comment by
Burrows and/or determine if there is any conceptual difference between
the intentions of the current “aptitude hold” and “apt-mark hold”.
Both seem to be about preventing a package from being upgraded or
removed (etc.) by actions such as dist-upgrade, or installing/removing
another package, but is there anything extra intended by “aptitude
hold” which is not covered by “apt-mark hold”?
Take a look at the documentation for each, maybe have a poke around
the code, and see what the implications are.
The results of such an investigation will make it much easier for
developers to move forward on this.
More information about the Aptitude-devel