[Aptitude-devel] Bug#540978: aptitude: Aptitude makes the wrong choice when resolving conflict with alternative package
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montezelo at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 15:50:34 UTC 2015
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Josh,
2009-08-11 04:02 Josh Triplett:
>Package: aptitude
>Version: 0.4.11.11-1+b2
>Severity: normal
>
>I have a metapackage josh-gui, which among other things depends on
>totem-xine and conflicts with totem-gstreamer. Various packages depend
>on totem-gstreamer | totem-xine, such as gnome-desktop-environment and
>totem-plugins. Whenever a new version of totem comes out, and I attempt
>to upgrade to it (usually by hitting + on the "video" section including
>totem-common, totem-xine, and totem-plugins), aptitude gets confused: it
>attempts to pull in totem-gstreamer (despite not needing it to satisfy
>any dependencies, with totem-xine already installed), and it then
>correctly concludes that it has broken josh-gui. Furthermore, to fix
>this brokenness, it initially proposes removing josh-gui; its *second*
>solution does the right thing by choosing *not* to install
>totem-gstreamer in the first place.
Have you seen this behaviour recently, with this package of yours or
others?
The resolution system changed a lot in the years after this bug report,
specially with 0.6. I could attempt to reproduce a similar case with
other packages (totem-xine and -gstreamer are not in unstable now), but
if you continue to have a similar set-up it would be quicker / more
reliable to confirm if the behaviour it's still happening as you saw it
in the past.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo at gmail.com>
More information about the Aptitude-devel
mailing list