From doko at debian.org  Thu Jun 16 13:07:38 2022
From: doko at debian.org (Matthias Klose)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 12:07:38 +0000
Subject: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#1012895: aptitude: ftbfs with GCC-12
Message-ID: <E1o1oHi-0000Wr-O8@paradis.debian.org>

Package: src:aptitude
Version: 0.8.13-4
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian-gcc at lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-12

[This bug is targeted to the upcoming bookworm release]

Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it
was filed for.  If a fix in another package is required, please
file a bug for the other package (or clone), and add a block in this
package. Please keep the issue open until the package can be built in
a follow-up test rebuild.

The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-12/g++-12, but succeeds to build with gcc-11/g++-11. The
severity of this report will be raised before the bookworm release.

The full build log can be found at:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/09/gcc12/aptitude_0.8.13-4_unstable_gcc12.log
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.

To build with GCC 11, either set CC=gcc-11 CXX=g++-11 explicitly,
or install the gcc, g++, gfortran, ... packages from experimental.

  apt-get -t=experimental install g++ 

Common build failures are new warnings resulting in build failures with
-Werror turned on, or new/dropped symbols in Debian symbols files.
For other C/C++ related build failures see the porting guide at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html

GCC 11 defaults to the GNU++17 standard.  If your package installs
header files in /usr/include, please don't work around C++17 issues
by choosing a lower C++ standard for the package build, but fix these
issues to build with the C++17 standard.

[...]
/usr/include/cppunit/tools/StringHelper.h:25:9: note:   mismatched types ?const _CharT*? and ?std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >?
   25 |     ost << x;
      |     ~~~~^~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/bits/ostream.tcc:302:5: note: candidate: ?template<class _CharT, class _Traits> std::basic_ostream<_Ch, _Tr>& std::operator<<(basic_ostream<_Ch, _Tr>&, const char*)?
  302 |     operator<<(basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>& __out, const char* __s)
      |     ^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/bits/ostream.tcc:302:5: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
/usr/include/cppunit/tools/StringHelper.h:25:9: note:   cannot convert ?x? (type ?const std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >?) to type ?const char*?
   25 |     ost << x;
      |     ~~~~^~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/ostream:615:5: note: candidate: ?template<class _Traits> std::basic_ostream<char, _Traits>& std::operator<<(basic_ostream<char, _Traits>&, const char*)?
  615 |     operator<<(basic_ostream<char, _Traits>& __out, const char* __s)
      |     ^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/ostream:615:5: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
/usr/include/cppunit/tools/StringHelper.h:25:9: note:   cannot convert ?x? (type ?const std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >?) to type ?const char*?
   25 |     ost << x;
      |     ~~~~^~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/ostream:628:5: note: candidate: ?template<class _Traits> std::basic_ostream<char, _Traits>& std::operator<<(basic_ostream<char, _Traits>&, const signed char*)?
  628 |     operator<<(basic_ostream<char, _Traits>& __out, const signed char* __s)
      |     ^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/ostream:628:5: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
/usr/include/cppunit/tools/StringHelper.h:25:9: note:   cannot convert ?x? (type ?const std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >?) to type ?const signed char*?
   25 |     ost << x;
      |     ~~~~^~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/ostream:633:5: note: candidate: ?template<class _Traits> std::basic_ostream<char, _Traits>& std::operator<<(basic_ostream<char, _Traits>&, const unsigned char*)?
  633 |     operator<<(basic_ostream<char, _Traits>& __out, const unsigned char* __s)
      |     ^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/ostream:633:5: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
/usr/include/cppunit/tools/StringHelper.h:25:9: note:   cannot convert ?x? (type ?const std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >?) to type ?const unsigned char*?
   25 |     ost << x;
      |     ~~~~^~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/ostream:754:5: note: candidate: ?template<class _Ostream, class _Tp> _Ostream&& std::operator<<(_Ostream&&, const _Tp&)?
  754 |     operator<<(_Ostream&& __os, const _Tp& __x)
      |     ^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/ostream:754:5: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
/usr/include/c++/12/ostream: In substitution of ?template<class _Ostream, class _Tp> _Ostream&& std::operator<<(_Ostream&&, const _Tp&) [with _Ostream = std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream<char>&; _Tp = std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >]?:
/usr/include/cppunit/tools/StringHelper.h:25:9:   required from ?typename std::enable_if<(! std::is_enum<_Tp>::value), std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >::type CppUnit::StringHelper::toString(const T&) [with T = std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >; typename std::enable_if<(! std::is_enum<_Tp>::value), std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >::type = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>]?
/usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:74:50:   required from ?static std::string CppUnit::assertion_traits<T>::toString(const T&) [with T = std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >; std::string = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>]?
/usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:168:58:   required from ?void CppUnit::assertEquals(const T&, const T&, SourceLine, const std::string&) [with T = std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >; std::string = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>]?
../../tests/test_parsers.cc:140:3:   required from ?void verify_success(const std::string&, const P&, const typename strip_shared_ptrs_result::apply<typename P::result_type>::type&) [with P = parsers::concatenate_p<parsers::andfirst_p<parsers::integer_p, parsers::skipMany_p<parsers::charif_p<char, parsers::space_f> > >, parsers::andfirst_p<parsers::integer_p, parsers::skipMany_p<parsers::charif_p<char, parsers::space_f> > > >; std::string = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; typename strip_shared_ptrs_result::apply<typename P::result_type>::type = std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >; typename P::result_type = std::shared_ptr<std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> > >]?
../../tests/test_parsers.cc:1642:21:   required from here
/usr/include/c++/12/ostream:754:5: error: no type named ?type? in ?struct std::enable_if<false, void>?
/usr/include/cppunit/tools/StringHelper.h: In instantiation of ?typename std::enable_if<(! std::is_enum<_Tp>::value), std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >::type CppUnit::StringHelper::toString(const T&) [with T = std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >; typename std::enable_if<(! std::is_enum<_Tp>::value), std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >::type = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>]?:
/usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:74:50:   required from ?static std::string CppUnit::assertion_traits<T>::toString(const T&) [with T = std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >; std::string = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>]?
/usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:168:58:   required from ?void CppUnit::assertEquals(const T&, const T&, SourceLine, const std::string&) [with T = std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >; std::string = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>]?
../../tests/test_parsers.cc:140:3:   required from ?void verify_success(const std::string&, const P&, const typename strip_shared_ptrs_result::apply<typename P::result_type>::type&) [with P = parsers::concatenate_p<parsers::andfirst_p<parsers::integer_p, parsers::skipMany_p<parsers::charif_p<char, parsers::space_f> > >, parsers::andfirst_p<parsers::integer_p, parsers::skipMany_p<parsers::charif_p<char, parsers::space_f> > > >; std::string = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; typename strip_shared_ptrs_result::apply<typename P::result_type>::type = std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >; typename P::result_type = std::shared_ptr<std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> > >]?
../../tests/test_parsers.cc:1642:21:   required from here
/usr/include/c++/12/cstddef:123:5: note: candidate: ?template<class _IntegerType> constexpr std::__byte_op_t<_IntegerType> std::operator<<(byte, _IntegerType)?
  123 |     operator<<(byte __b, _IntegerType __shift) noexcept
      |     ^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/cstddef:123:5: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
/usr/include/cppunit/tools/StringHelper.h:25:5: note:   cannot convert ?ost? (type ?CppUnit::OStringStream? {aka ?std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream<char>?}) to type ?std::byte?
   25 |     ost << x;
      |     ^~~
/usr/include/c++/12/complex:555:5: note: candidate: ?template<class _Tp, class _CharT, class _Traits> std::basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>& std::operator<<(basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>&, const complex<_Tp>&)?
  555 |     operator<<(basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>& __os, const complex<_Tp>& __x)
      |     ^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/12/complex:555:5: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
/usr/include/cppunit/tools/StringHelper.h:25:9: note:   ?const std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >? is not derived from ?const std::complex<_Tp>?
   25 |     ost << x;
      |     ~~~~^~~~
make[3]: *** [Makefile:869: test_parsers.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build/tests'
make[2]: *** [Makefile:1169: check-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build/tests'
/bin/sh: 1: ./cppunit_test: not found
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:39: override_dh_auto_test-arch] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
make: *** [debian/rules:22: binary] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2


From abe at debian.org  Thu Jun 16 14:05:32 2022
From: abe at debian.org (Axel Beckert)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:05:32 +0200
Subject: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#1012895: Bug#1012895: aptitude: ftbfs with
 GCC-12
In-Reply-To: <E1o1oHi-0000Wr-O8@paradis.debian.org>
References: <E1o1oHi-0000Wr-O8@paradis.debian.org>
 <E1o1oHi-0000Wr-O8@paradis.debian.org>
Message-ID: <20220616130530.6fd7ktpr2hh5mduj@sym.noone.org>

Control: tag -1 + moreinfo

Hi Matthias,

Matthias Klose wrote:
> The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
> gcc-12/g++-12, but succeeds to build with gcc-11/g++-11.

Thanks for the heads up!

> To build with GCC 11, either set CC=gcc-11 CXX=g++-11 explicitly,

I think you mean 12 instead of 11.

> GCC 11 defaults to the GNU++17 standard.  If your package installs
> header files in /usr/include, please don't work around C++17 issues
> by choosing a lower C++ standard for the package build, but fix these
> issues to build with the C++17 standard.

Is the same copy & paste error from the GCC 11 bug reports back then
as above or is this actually correct for GCC 12? Please clarify.

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe at debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE


From owner at bugs.debian.org  Thu Jun 16 14:09:03 2022
From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:09:03 +0000
Subject: [Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#1012895: aptitude: ftbfs with
 GCC-12
References: <20220616130530.6fd7ktpr2hh5mduj@sym.noone.org>
 <E1o1oHi-0000Wr-O8@paradis.debian.org>
Message-ID: <handler.s.M1012895.165538475311207.transcript@bugs.debian.org>

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1012895 [src:aptitude] aptitude: ftbfs with GCC-12
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
1012895: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012895
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems


From doko at debian.org  Thu Jun 16 14:08:44 2022
From: doko at debian.org (Matthias Klose)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:08:44 +0200
Subject: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#1012895: Bug#1012895: aptitude: ftbfs with
 GCC-12
In-Reply-To: <20220616130530.6fd7ktpr2hh5mduj@sym.noone.org>
References: <E1o1oHi-0000Wr-O8@paradis.debian.org>
 <20220616130530.6fd7ktpr2hh5mduj@sym.noone.org>
 <E1o1oHi-0000Wr-O8@paradis.debian.org>
Message-ID: <60647af8-a520-e7d8-54ac-b69349aa07f5@debian.org>

On 16.06.22 15:05, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
> 
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>> The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
>> gcc-12/g++-12, but succeeds to build with gcc-11/g++-11.
> 
> Thanks for the heads up!
> 
>> To build with GCC 11, either set CC=gcc-11 CXX=g++-11 explicitly,
> 
> I think you mean 12 instead of 11.

yes, sorry about that.


From vincent at vinc17.net  Thu Jun 16 14:15:11 2022
From: vincent at vinc17.net (Vincent Lefevre)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:15:11 +0200
Subject: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#1013075: aptitude: "aptitude why" outputs a
 chain with a package that is not installed
Message-ID: <20220616131511.GA1371630@zira.vinc17.org>

Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.13-4
Severity: normal

zira:~> aptitude why gobject-introspection
i   libglib2.0-dev         Suggests libgirepository1.0-dev (>= 1.62)     
p   libgirepository1.0-dev Depends  gobject-introspection (= 1.72.0-1+b1)

while libgirepository1.0-dev isn't installed. So this doesn't give an
explanation of why gobject-introspection is automatically installed.

FYI, this is after

Start-Date: 2022-06-16  14:53:32
Commandline: apt install dh-sequence-gir gtk-doc-tools libgirepository1.0-dev libnss3-dev libglib2.0-doc libcairo2-doc
Install: libglib2.0-doc:amd64 (2.72.2-2), libnspr4-dev:amd64 (2:4.34-1, automatic), libnss3-dev:amd64 (2:3.79-1), python3-mako:amd64 (1.1.3+ds1-3, automatic), gobject-introspection:amd64 (1.72.0-1+b1), docbook:amd64 (4.5-10, automatic), python3-markdown:amd64 (3.3.7-1, automatic), gtk-doc-tools:amd64 (1.33.2-1), libcairo2-doc:amd64 (1.16.0-5), libgirepository1.0-dev:amd64 (1.72.0-1+b1), docbook-to-man:amd64 (1:2.0.0-45, automatic)
End-Date: 2022-06-16  14:53:36

Start-Date: 2022-06-16  15:01:07
Commandline: apt remove --purge dh-sequence-gir gtk-doc-tools libgirepository1.0-dev libnss3-dev libglib2.0-doc libcairo2-doc docbook-to-man libnspr4-dev
Purge: libglib2.0-doc:amd64 (2.72.2-2), libnspr4-dev:amd64 (2:4.34-1), libnss3-dev:amd64 (2:3.79-1), gtk-doc-tools:amd64 (1.33.2-1), libcairo2-doc:amd64 (1.16.0-5), libgirepository1.0-dev:amd64 (1.72.0-1+b1), docbook-to-man:amd64 (1:2.0.0-45)
End-Date: 2022-06-16  15:01:09

-- Package-specific info:
Terminal: xterm-256color
$DISPLAY is set.
which aptitude: /usr/bin/aptitude

aptitude version information:
aptitude 0.8.13
Compiler: g++ 11.3.0
Compiled against:
  apt version 6.0.0
  NCurses version 6.3
  libsigc++ version: 2.10.4
  Gtk+ support disabled.
  Qt support disabled.

Current library versions:
  NCurses version: ncurses 6.3.20220423
  cwidget version: 0.5.18
  Apt version: 6.0.0

aptitude linkage:
	linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe39dfe000)
	libgtk3-nocsd.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk3-nocsd.so.0 (0x00007faba6b3b000)
	libapt-pkg.so.6.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0 (0x00007faba6946000)
	libncursesw.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libncursesw.so.6 (0x00007faba690b000)
	libtinfo.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6 (0x00007faba68d9000)
	libsigc-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsigc-2.0.so.0 (0x00007faba68d0000)
	libcwidget.so.4 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcwidget.so.4 (0x00007faba67c8000)
	libsqlite3.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0 (0x00007faba666c000)
	libboost_iostreams.so.1.74.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_iostreams.so.1.74.0 (0x00007faba6653000)
	libxapian.so.30 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxapian.so.30 (0x00007faba6430000)
	libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007faba640f000)
	libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007faba61f4000)
	libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007faba60b0000)
	libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007faba608e000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007faba5eb5000)
	libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007faba5eaf000)
	libresolv.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libresolv.so.2 (0x00007faba5e95000)
	libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007faba5e78000)
	libbz2.so.1.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbz2.so.1.0 (0x00007faba5e65000)
	liblzma.so.5 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblzma.so.5 (0x00007faba5e3b000)
	liblz4.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblz4.so.1 (0x00007faba5e18000)
	libzstd.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libzstd.so.1 (0x00007faba5d5f000)
	libudev.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libudev.so.1 (0x00007faba5d35000)
	libsystemd.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsystemd.so.0 (0x00007faba5c62000)
	libgcrypt.so.20 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcrypt.so.20 (0x00007faba5b1b000)
	libxxhash.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxxhash.so.0 (0x00007faba5b04000)
	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007faba6f79000)
	librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007faba5afa000)
	libuuid.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007faba5af1000)
	libcap.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcap.so.2 (0x00007faba5ae6000)
	libgpg-error.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgpg-error.so.0 (0x00007faba5abb000)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.17.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii  aptitude-common           0.8.13-4
ii  libapt-pkg6.0             2.5.0
ii  libboost-iostreams1.74.0  1.74.0-16
ii  libc6                     2.33-7
ii  libcwidget4               0.5.18-5
ii  libgcc-s1                 12.1.0-2
ii  libncursesw6              6.3+20220423-2
ii  libsigc++-2.0-0v5         2.10.4-2
ii  libsqlite3-0              3.38.5-1
ii  libstdc++6                12.1.0-2
ii  libtinfo6                 6.3+20220423-2
ii  libxapian30               1.4.18-4

Versions of packages aptitude recommends:
ii  libdpkg-perl    1.21.8
ii  sensible-utils  0.0.17

Versions of packages aptitude suggests:
ii  apt-xapian-index                0.53
ii  aptitude-doc-en [aptitude-doc]  0.8.13-4
pn  debtags                         <none>
ii  tasksel                         3.69+rebuild

-- no debconf information

-- 
Vincent Lef?vre <vincent at vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)


From abe at debian.org  Thu Jun 16 14:17:56 2022
From: abe at debian.org (Axel Beckert)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:17:56 +0200
Subject: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#1012895: Bug#1012895: Bug#1012895: aptitude:
 ftbfs with GCC-12
In-Reply-To: <60647af8-a520-e7d8-54ac-b69349aa07f5@debian.org>
 <20220616130530.6fd7ktpr2hh5mduj@sym.noone.org>
References: <E1o1oHi-0000Wr-O8@paradis.debian.org>
Message-ID: <20220616131756.fdkkwj4ve32gwnr7@sym.noone.org>

Hi Matthias,

Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > To build with GCC 11, either set CC=gcc-11 CXX=g++-11 explicitly,
> > 
> > I think you mean 12 instead of 11.
> 
> yes, sorry about that.

No problem. That was the obvious one.

But what about my second and more important question?

Axel Beckert wrote:
> > GCC 11 defaults to the GNU++17 standard.  If your package installs
> > header files in /usr/include, please don't work around C++17 issues
> > by choosing a lower C++ standard for the package build, but fix these
> > issues to build with the C++17 standard.
> 
> Is the same copy & paste error from the GCC 11 bug reports back then
> as above or is this actually correct for GCC 12? Please clarify.

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe at debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE


From doko at debian.org  Thu Jun 16 15:33:35 2022
From: doko at debian.org (Matthias Klose)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 16:33:35 +0200
Subject: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#1012895: Bug#1012895: Bug#1012895: aptitude:
 ftbfs with GCC-12
In-Reply-To: <20220616131756.fdkkwj4ve32gwnr7@sym.noone.org>
References: <20220616131756.fdkkwj4ve32gwnr7@sym.noone.org>
 <E1o1oHi-0000Wr-O8@paradis.debian.org>
Message-ID: <416a0fd9-fca8-b9e7-1a48-0ff105f8ee1e@debian.org>

On 16.06.22 15:17, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>> To build with GCC 11, either set CC=gcc-11 CXX=g++-11 explicitly,
>>>
>>> I think you mean 12 instead of 11.
>>
>> yes, sorry about that.
> 
> No problem. That was the obvious one.
> 
> But what about my second and more important question?
> 
> Axel Beckert wrote:
>>> GCC 11 defaults to the GNU++17 standard.  If your package installs
>>> header files in /usr/include, please don't work around C++17 issues
>>> by choosing a lower C++ standard for the package build, but fix these
>>> issues to build with the C++17 standard.
>>
>> Is the same copy & paste error from the GCC 11 bug reports back then
>> as above or is this actually correct for GCC 12? Please clarify.

yes, the default C++ standard didn't change for GCC 12.


From abe at debian.org  Thu Jun 16 15:51:55 2022
From: abe at debian.org (Axel Beckert)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 16:51:55 +0200
Subject: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#1012895: Bug#1012895: Bug#1012895: aptitude:
 ftbfs with GCC-12
In-Reply-To: <416a0fd9-fca8-b9e7-1a48-0ff105f8ee1e@debian.org>
References: <20220616131756.fdkkwj4ve32gwnr7@sym.noone.org>
 <416a0fd9-fca8-b9e7-1a48-0ff105f8ee1e@debian.org>
 <E1o1oHi-0000Wr-O8@paradis.debian.org>
Message-ID: <20220616145151.t6k2mrbivyw3ciow@sym.noone.org>

Control: tag -1 - moreinfo

Hi Matthias,

Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > GCC 11 defaults to the GNU++17 standard.  If your package installs
> > > > header files in /usr/include, please don't work around C++17 issues
> > > > by choosing a lower C++ standard for the package build, but fix these
> > > > issues to build with the C++17 standard.
> > > 
> > > Is the same copy & paste error from the GCC 11 bug reports back then
> > > as above or is this actually correct for GCC 12? Please clarify.
> 
> yes, the default C++ standard didn't change for GCC 12.

Thanks!

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe at debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE


From owner at bugs.debian.org  Thu Jun 16 15:54:06 2022
From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 14:54:06 +0000
Subject: [Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#1012895: Bug#1012895: aptitude:
 ftbfs with GCC-12
References: <20220616145151.t6k2mrbivyw3ciow@sym.noone.org>
 <E1o1oHi-0000Wr-O8@paradis.debian.org>
Message-ID: <handler.s.M1012895.165539112027904.transcript@bugs.debian.org>

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1012895 [src:aptitude] aptitude: ftbfs with GCC-12
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
1012895: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012895
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems