[Babel-users] SIGHUP shouldn't kill babeld

[Julien Cristau]

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 09:11:12 +0100, Gabriel Kerneis wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:19:43PM -0500, Charles N Wyble wrote:
> > Um. What is confusing about this? 
> 
> Different behaviour depending on a seemingly unrelated flag, wouldn't work with
> daemon managers that refuse double-fork (such as runit).  On second thought, if
> it really needs to be tweaked, a command-line flag (disabled by default) seems a
> better option.
> 
And really if sending a different signal is all that difficult, you're
doing it wrong.

Cheers,
Julien
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/babel-users/attachments/20130924/cd34f825/attachment.sig>