[Babel-users] alternate source specific encoding?

[Dave Taht]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<jch at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
>> is that in a branch somewhere yet?
>
> No, sorry.

Got an ETA?

I'm in the process of rebuilding the yurtlab, as the ath9k
make-wifi-fast and airtime fairness patches are nearly mature. I'm
going to be firing up adhoc tests in particular soon. I don't have any
huge need for this shift to a different wire format for source
specific stuff, just, if I'm going to flash 20 boxes, I'd just as soon
have it there, as there are a few circumstances in the testbed where
it's
useful to generate a test using source specific to exercise different APs.

Out of git head + your patch,  I've been running with the unicast IHU
successfully for a while now. No measurements, sorry, but it doesn't
crash. I've also become allergic to the CS6 marking and am still
marking stuff ECT(2) in places.

Also I think I may have a tenative recommendation for a higher end and
still-manufactured box  than the wndr3800 that might be suitable for
some indoor deployments. They cost about 80 bucks.

https://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/ubiquiti/unifiac

In AP/station mode they are eating about 12% sirq at 65mbit HT20
2.4ghz, and in tests in AP/bridge mode the ath10k in it (which has
some firmware from candelatech for IBSS), is cracking 450mbit.

-- 
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org