[Babel-users] Some notes on seqno requests in Babel
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
toke at toke.dk
Sun Oct 29 11:38:26 UTC 2017
Juliusz Chroboczek <jch at irif.fr> writes:
>>> Toke, David, what do you guys think -- shall we leave this undefined, or
>>> should we add some values?
>
>> Hmm, suppose it wouldn't hurt to add it to appendix B?
>
> Add what? The values used by babeld? The values used by BIRD? The
> optimal values determined through careful testing?
The other values in the appendix are from babeld, aren't they?
> I've done a fair amount of testing that the mechanism itself is
> effective, but I've never done testing with differing timeout values,
> my assumption being that it doesn't matter.
Well, an explicit note to that effect would also be useful I guess (the
text in the main spec that says something like "a small number" sort of
makes this implicit, but spelling it out may be useful)?
-Toke
More information about the Babel-users
mailing list