[Babel-users] Some notes on seqno requests in Babel

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 03:22:19AM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Dear Ondrej,
> 
> I think that RFC6126bis answers all of your comments except this one:

Hi

Thanks for all your answers. The first comment is clear. The second one,
well, once one knows what to expect then one would understand section
3.8.1.2 in that way, but IMHO for uninformed person the RFC6126bis
version of that section is even harder to understand properly than one
form RFC6126.

For the seqno request timeouts, IMHO it would be better to have some
suggested values in Appending B like for other values. Total number of
retransmissions is probably less important than retransmission timeout
value.

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/babel-users/attachments/20171029/8463e41f/attachment.sig>