[Babel-users] Route-dete :wq

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch at irif.fr> writes:

>> Well, that is quite useful in any case.
>
> It's very useful, but it creates extra state, extra timers, and might
> timeout over wireless (EIGRP style). So I'm not really sure how I feel
> about it.

Sure, it adds a bit of temporary state; but if it times out it just
means you'll just end up back at the hold time mechanism. I.e., it
doesn't make anything worse...

-Toke