[Debian-astro-maintainers] Bug#822259: Bug#822259: yt: diff for NMU version 3.2.1-2.1

Tobias Frost tobi at debian.org
Fri Apr 22 17:29:16 UTC 2016


Am Freitag, den 22.04.2016, 19:14 +0200 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> Hi Tobias,
> 
> Tobias Frost wrote:
> > I've prepared an NMU for yt (versioned as 3.2.1-2.1). The diff
> > is attached to this message.
> 
> Thanks, appreciated! A few comments though:
> 
> > +  * Remove B-D on libpng (Closes: #810209)
> 
> The diff doesn't contain changes in debian/control. Looks like they
> were forgotten in the diff.

You're right, I did forget to include d/control.
I'll do another iteration to fixing this mistake.

(Reason for that: yt does not cleanup properly after build,
so I nuked the build dir before final build and I did simply forgot to 
cp the modified d/control in place. Actually I should file that as a
bug, too)


> And you don't want to remove a B-D on libpng but one on libpng-dev.
> I'd appreciate if you could be that precise in the changelog entry.

Oversight from my side, I'm sorry. 

> > diff -Nru yt-3.2.1/debian/patches/try-to-fix-ftbs.patch yt-
> > 3.2.1/debian/patches/try-to-fix-ftbs.patch
> > --- yt-3.2.1/debian/patches/try-to-fix-ftbs.patch	1970-01-01 
> > 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
> > +++ yt-3.2.1/debian/patches/try-to-fix-ftbs.patch	2016-04-22 
> > 17:47:45.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> > +Description: <short description, required>
> > + <long description that can span multiple lines, optional>
> > +Author: <name and email of author, optional>
> > +Origin: https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/commits/069715baac70d
> > 5f0b186293b518eaf3802798370?at=yt
> > + https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/commits/3f7547299119397d1e2e
> > 2baa1d42f809aef21e35
> > +Bug: <URL to the upstream bug report if any, implies patch has
> > been forwarded, optional>
> > +Bug-<Vendor>: <URL to the vendor bug report if any, optional>
> > +Forwarded: <URL|no|not-needed, useless if you have a Bug field,
> > optional>
> > +Applied-Upstream: <version|URL|commit, identifies patches merged
> > upstream, optional>
> > +Reviewed-by: <name and email of a reviewer, optional>
> > +Last-Update: <YYYY-MM-DD, last update of the meta-information,
> > optional>
> 
> Please either fill out this DEP3 template or remove it completely.
> But
> seeing a package uploaded with such completely useless dummy data
> gives a very bad after-taste.
> 
> 		Regards, Axel

It has been fixed before upload, but after I sent nmudiff.



More information about the Debian-astro-maintainers mailing list