[Debian-astro-maintainers] skyview_3.2.3+repack-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Ole Streicher
olebole at debian.org
Tue Mar 21 16:18:15 UTC 2017
Hi Thorsten,
as often it is difficult to get this from scientists, it was already
difficult to get a clear statement. However, I think I could include the
statement Tom McGlynn made to me in the copyright:
SkyView was prepared in part by me as a private citizen and as a federal
(US) employee. I assert no personal copyright and to the extent that
SkyView has been maintained as a part of my federal employment, it is in
the public domain with respect to US copyright protections see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government#Copyright_in_government_works_prior_to_1895.
Would that be OK for you?
Best regards
Ole
On 21.03.2017 17:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Ole,
>
> I am afraid a statement in a private email is not enough.
> Wouldn't it be possible for upstream to put this statement into the source tarball?
>
> Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
>
More information about the Debian-astro-maintainers
mailing list