[Debian-astro-maintainers] Oakleaf upload request (Fwd: oakleaf_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

[Ole Streicher]

Hi Filip,

I just uploaded the binary packages; indeed new packages require an 
upload from a DD.

I also pushed a debian/gitlab-ci.yml to the Gitlab repository. This 
enables automated test builds, autopkgtests, lintian and more tests 
running on Salsa on each push.

Once the package was accepted, do not forget to upload a source-only 
package so that the package can migrate.

Best

Ole

On 03.02.25 11:24, Filip Hroch wrote:
> Dear Ole,
> 
> may I ask you for help with uploading of new Oakleaf?
> 
> I prepared the new version of Oakleaf library having
> major version increased on 1.0.0. Following reccomendations,
> the library name has been updated from liboakleaf0 to liboakleaf1,
> so the new binary package is introduced.
> 
> The upload was rejected peharps, I am, as DM, unable to upload
> new binary packages, if I understand correctly `ACL dm'.
> I believe it causes the rejection.
> 
> Oakleaf is ready in Debian's GIT repository.
> 
> Best regards, and thank you very much,
> FH
> 
> 
> Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> writes:
> 
>> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>>
>>
>> ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed
>>
>> binary:liboakleaf1 is NEW.
>> binary:liboakleaf1 is NEW.
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
>> concerns.
>>
>> [[End of PGP Signed Part]]
> 
> 
> -- 
> F. Hroch <hroch at physics.muni.cz>, Masaryk University,
> Dept. of theor. physics and astrophysics, Brno, Moravia, CZ
>